Talk:Alameda Community Learning Center
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone has vandalised the Contreversy section, I will revert. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maxman280 (talk • contribs).
Facism
[edit]Why is everyone so worried about "vandalism" maybe some of your students opionions are valid, negative as they may be. Why was the controvesey section deleted. Are people scared to let the students feelings on the school be heard? Sounds like one of the classic examples of aclc facism that I remember from attending. And as for cole "Excuse my dumb nerdy friends for consistantly vandalizing WIkipedia, they recognize bordom as one of their closest friends at our school.", that is one of the most nerdy sentances I have heard in my life. Im sure this will be removed. I don't know how aclc give out the appearance of being a liberal school when they spend all their time censoring.
Vandalism to the Controversy section
[edit]Someone has recently vandalized the controversy section by deleting it, I strongly advise that this person be warned or temporarily banned. -El Maxo 19:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Recent Vandalisms
[edit]This page has been trying to convince people of the "Annual Wikipedia Vandalism Faire." Which is not true, my dumb friends have been making accounts to mess with this article and vandalise it. Due ignore the controversy if it comes up again
Also, The vandalism in the athletics sections was very uncalled for.
By the way, Our mascot does not exist, we dont have one. It is not a couch, and it is not "Todd, the dancing now and later." Diggity-diggity-doom 19:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- ...Its a real thing. In fact, the Wikipedia Vandalism Club is responible for even adding the information about it in the first place. I, myself, am friends with the club leader and several prominent members. Next time check your sources before you delete vandalism. -El Maxo 19:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Umm there are REAL controversy that SHOULD be coverd Billybreaths21 22:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
IM N UR PAJE
[edit]LOL, I FIXED VANDALIZM...RAWR OMG, HE WAS LIKE RAWR, SO I WAS LIKE RAWR 01:31, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Sections
[edit]I believe each section is supposed to be indicated with two equals signs and not one. with one it makes it look very large. Skhatri2005 01:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Consistent vandalism
[edit]After all of the changes i have made to the page, i believe there is no reason to edit it any further. I suggest keeping this page on a pretty regular check to make sure the vandals to not add false information. Though maxman280 had a great cover story, it was not true. 24.143.154.203 08:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- It IS true, and although you may not believe it, I realise now that it is not notable and therby does not belong. Perhaps another more notable event in the future will occur that deserves a place on the Wiki. -El Maxo 16:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
What this article needs
[edit]Is an explanation of what this school is, what it does different and why it works.
P.S. Sorry about all that vandalism I did back then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlmAxo (talk • contribs) 08:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)