Talk:Al-Suwaidi (Riyadh)

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This entire article is based on a single source, the sensationalist journalism of John Bradley. Contrary to Bradley's claims, Al-Sweidy is an ordinary middle to lower-middle class neighborhood. It is not a "slum," and its streets are as wide as any other neighborhood in Riyadh. It is definitely NOT considered a "no go" for police. That is simply ludicrous. In 2004, some terrorists were found in Al-Sweidy, but such people were identified in many other parts of Riyadh, including many affluent areas. -- Slacker (talk) 13:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slacker! If Al-Suwaidi is, in fact, a middle class neighborhood, then are there sources describing it as such?
As per WP:V Verifiability, and not truth, is the criterion for inclusion. So if the only sources (in any language) explicitly describe the community in the way Bradley does, then that is how Wikipedia's going to describe it.
John R. Bradley's book is published by Palgrave Macmillan, a reliable publisher, so it is a reliable source.
The Arab News also did a feature on Al-Suwaidi... I'll take a look at the article...
WhisperToMe (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, the Arab News did say that it had "middle income" residents. But the way the neighborhood was described by the Arab News doesn't seem to contradict Bradley too much... WhisperToMe (talk) 18:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article about one of 130 or so districts of Riyadh. The only reason this article exists are the news of As-Suwaidi being a terrorist stronghold in 2003/2005. This seems rather stale now. It would make more sense to approach the divisions of Riyadh systematically, i.e. creating articles on its 15 municipalities. "As-Suwaidi" would become a section of the page on the Al-Urayja branch municipality. The content on its being a "slum" or terrorism stronghold can still be featured there, of course, but within WP:DUE. --dab (𒁳) 10:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on As-Suwaidi (Riyadh). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120523183210/http://archive.arabnews.com/?page=1&section=0&article=57286&d=9&m=1&y=2005 to http://archive.arabnews.com/?page=1&section=0&article=57286&d=9&m=1&y=2005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]