Talk:Al-Hajj

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

File:022 abdulbaset haj.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:022 abdulbaset haj.ogg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

@HyperGaruda: Thank you for your edits. I have been struggling with the same problems over 114 suras. I can see that you are genuinely interested in improving this article. I would hope that you can see that same quality in my edits. I really do think Wherry has produced a summary, not a list. Noting your comment here I am wondering if we could continue the conversation here. Frankly without a summary I find the sura articles impenetrable. I am interested why you left the summary intact? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JorgeLaArdilla: I did not touch the summary, because I did not pay attention to it, as it was located in a different section. I am not endorsing it, but unless there is a clear consensus, I am also not going to do anything about it. My edit was solely directed toward removing a disambiguation needed tag, though I got a bit carried away by my inner Grammar Nazi. --HyperGaruda (talk) 04:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]