This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Yes, because his doctrines are described in the parts of the Buddhist Canon that have been translated into Chinese and not preserved in Sanskrit. noychoH (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"There is no evidence[citation needed] to support that Kesamkambali was a hedonist, because he led a very simple life. He wore a garment made of hair and lived an ascetic lifestyle. He did not wear precious ornaments, did not surround himself with beautiful women, and did not live in gluttony. Hedonism was used as a "straw man" argument by opponents of Charvaka."
This description, in fact, goes very well with the Epicurean school definition of hedonism which cannot be separated from ataraxia and aponia. I believe applyig the modern-day misconception of the term hedonism here is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8070:D187:E600:F4BF:36A2:147D:9027 (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
