Talk:Aircraft ordnance

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

Explosives High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

On 14 September 2012, it was proposed that this article be moved to Ordnance. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Aircraft ordnance → Ordnance –

Requesting move to ordnance, as that term is simpler and in common use. 70.247.162.84 (talk) 15:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose "ordnance" is not restricted to aircraft ordnance, your move request implies that aircraft ordnance is the only type of ordnance. Further ordnance exists as an article, and I see no point in deleting it for this article. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 20:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for the reasons given above.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - existing article, not the primary topic and the disambiguation needed for this particular usage of the term.GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - They are not the same subject. - Ahunt (talk) 23:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For the same reasons. I'm only piling on because I wonder if the user who made this suggestion really meant what they said. Do they want the sparse content of this article merged into Weapons, since Ordnance is a disambiguation page? --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
oppose Suggested name would imply non-aircraft ordnance too. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:09, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aircraft ordnance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140105033728/http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3228 to http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3228

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]