Jump to content

Talk:Air India Flight 182/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Bias

The section on the 'Government of India' theory seems to be self-promotion. I have no issue with it being included, and I suppose there could be some need to state the credentials of journalists who have proposed a conspiracy theory that is outside of the mainstream, but do we need to know that Mr. McAndrew is originally from Niagara Falls? If no one objects, I think it ought to be cleaned up a bit. -ALC

March 18th Added more information on what was known before and after the bombing. Changed "bomb brothers" to something a little more descriptive. Changed the beginning to get to the point and removed some repeated information throughout.

This page says "The bomb caused a rapid decompression, followed by a rapid decompression". Could someone who knows about planes please fix this?

1. I know about planes. 2. Its a typo, not an "error of knowledge". I meant to say that na inflight breakup came after the decompression. WhisperToMe 21:25, 26 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I'm having trouble making sense of this article. Mr. Singh wanted his suitcase put on an entirely different flight than the one he was on? The article says he only had one suitcase, which exploded when the baggage handlers were transferring it to Flight 301, then the article says that Flight 182 disappeared with "a cackling sound" (was a terrorist laughing over the radio?) and then the article says that the suitcase "wound up on" Flight 182... the chronology of the article is confusing. And it says the attack was "led by Sikh nationalists" - how was this known? Did they claim responsibility, and how was it proven? And some victims really survived a fall of 31,000 feet?! It would really help if the article were clarified. Brian Kendig 16:42, 17 May 2004 (UTC)

1. The cackling sound was the explosion, of course. 2. Mr. Singh never came on any flight, and neither did L. Singh. Two different people had two different suitcases. 3. I got the "survived the fall" thing from the CBC special report. 4. The CBC report includes information on how the Canadian government bungled the case and the pruported motives of the men accused of the bombing.

WhisperToMe 07:11, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

It does no good to tell me all that HERE! Please clarify the article! (By 'cackling sound' you probably meant 'crackling sound,' right?) - Brian Kendig 12:09, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
In many cases, it does all the good telling you here; you didn't read carefully enough in some of the cases (esp. in the Mr. Singh case - You misread "Mr. Singh" and "L. Singh" as being one person) - Also, some of the issues were resolved before I replied but after you voiced your complaint. WhisperToMe 19:17, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Changed "the trial was marred by pre-trial motions ..." to "the trial was delayed by pre-trial motions." Providing due process is not a bad thing. --LeeHunter 13:41, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Why is there no reference to the book Soft Target detailing an investigation into the background to this event? The findings in Soft Target were (paraphrasing) that the Hindustan Government had some involvement in what happened, in an attempt to slander Sikhs in Canada.

Looks like investigation is open again [1]

Alternate theories

Vancouver papers report that the alternate theories that it was a conspiracy by the Indian government were not considered credible by the public or were discounted at trial. That sounds like reasonable language to use in this article regarding the alternate theories. Canuckle 04:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Some new content was added about Parmar's alleged confession in 1992. I asked on the Reliable Sources guideline page whether the source was reliable and received the following feedback so I'll copy the Tehelka-sourced content here for discussion and better sourcing:

Tehelka on terrorism

  • Tehelka, an investigative paper in India, has been cited as the source for claims that a suspected terrorist identified the Indian gov't and not Sikh separatists as being behind the worst act of aviation terrrorism prior to 9-11. See new content added to Air India Flight 182 and Talwinder Singh Parmar. Does anyone have perspective on whether it is a reliable source? The theory had in the past been discredited, but if reliable sources are examining it, I guess we have to cover it. Canuckle 00:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • I would say hold off on it until other sources are reporting their own findings (as opposed to reporting what Tehelka found). WP:RS says "Exceptional claims require exceptional sources" and I would say that this would need more verification. Corpx 01:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
If this is something covered and discredited in multiple reliable sources, the best route for inclusion would be to mention the paper said X, but that this theory has been generally discredited. Be sure to cite mentions of the theory being widely discredited from reliable sources. To present the theory as potentially accurate, multiple reliable sources would need to be available as mentioned by Corpx. Vassyana 01:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Tehelka is a 'notable' source, but I dont think it can be called a 'reliable' source, especially in sensitive and controversial issues. Tehelka is known for sensationalism and its promoters and journalists themselves have been the subject of several legal/criminal investigations. So, anything they say has to be taken with truckloads of salt. Sarvagnya 01:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Until such time as there are no reasons to discredit a news report, there is no justification to remove it from the main entry, especially since it adds such an important aspect.
If there are contradictory reports, as user:Vassyana says, let us mention them first. But I don't see any contrary evidence being mentioned in the talk page or in the main article before it was removed.
As for Tehelka, it is a respectable and influential investigative newsmagazine in India. It came to the fore after a sting investigation of an Indian defence bribery scandal the reportage of which has stood the test of time. It is headed by Tarun Tejpal who is a noted journalist and author, and has several respected editors like Sankarshan Thakur. The paper is fiercely independent, and believes in being subscriber-funded; it carries far fewer ads than other magazines. It is a strongly liberal paper, with a leftish slant. In terms of reportage however, it is quite cautious, especially since it underwent several years of repressive legal suits after the first defence scam expose.
In addition to Tehelka's reputation, the story itself is consistent with what is known, and it reveals the "Third Man" in the story, who had remained unnamed through the trial.
I am reinstating this passage, while stating that the matter has no other corroboration and making it clear that the news item is based on this source only. If there are reports discrediting this expose per se, please reference them first. mukerjee (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Confession to Punjab Police in 1992

In July 2007, the investigative paper Tehelka reported that new evidence had been presented to the John Major commission John Major Commission of Inquiry and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) by the Punjab Human Rights Organisation (PHRO), a Chandigarh-based NGO that conducted interviews of Parmar’s associates and prepared a comprehensive report over seven years. The key part of the evidence is a confession by militant Talwinder Singh Parmar, who was widely suspected to have had a hand in the bombing. The confession was extracted by the Punjab Police on the days prior to his encounter shooting death on October 15, 1992[1]. This evidence, in the form of audiotapes and statements, had been preserved by retired Punjab Police DSP Harmail Singh Chandi, the key official behind Parmar's arrest at Jammu in September 1992, and his subsequent interrogation between October 9 to 14.

The main revelation is that the blasts were instigated by Lakhbir Singh Brar Rode, a nephew of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, and carried out by him and Inderjit Singh Reyat, who has already been sentenced as an accessory in the crime. Parmar supplied the dynamite. The apparent confession clearly delineates the details behind the plot:

"Around May 1985, a functionary of the International Sikh Youth Federation came to me and introduced himself as Lakhbir Singh and asked me for help in conducting some violent activities to express the resentment of the Sikhs. I told him to come after a few days so that I could arrange for dynamite and battery etc. He told me that he would first like to see a trial of the blast...After about four days, Lakhbir Singh and another youth, Inderjit Singh Reyat, both came to me. We went into the jungle (of British Columbia). There we joined a dynamite stick with a battery and triggered off a blast. Lakhbir and Inderjit, even at that time, had in their minds a plan to blast an aeroplane. I was not too keen on this plan but agreed to arrange for the dynamite sticks. Inderjit wanted to use for this purpose a transistor fitted with a battery...That very day, they took dynamite sticks from me and left.
Then Lakhbir Singh, Inderjit Singh and their accomplice, Manjit Singh, made a plan to plant bombs in an Air India (AI) plane leaving from Toronto via London for Delhi and another flight that was to leave Tokyo for Bangkok. Lakhbir Singh got the seat booking done from Vancouver to Tokyo and then onwards to Bangkok, while Manjit Singh got it done from Vancouver to Toronto and then from Toronto to Delhi. Inderjit prepared the bags for the flights, which were loaded with dynamite bombs fitted with a battery and transistor. They decided that the suitcases will be booked but they themselves will not travel by the same flights although they will take the boarding passes. After preparing these bombs, the plan was ready for execution by June 21 or 22, 1985. However, the bomb to be kept in the flight from Tokyo to Delhi via Bangkok exploded at the Narita airport on the conveyor belt. The second suitcase that was loaded on the Toronto-Delhi ai flight exploded in the air." - from the confession by Talwinder Singh Parmar[1]

After his interrogation, Parmar was shown as having been killed in an exchange of fire between police and six militants in the wee hours of 1992-10-15, near village Kang Arian in Phillar sub-division. However, the report says that actually, Parmar had been killed while in custody.

Immediately afterwards, Inspector Harmail Singh Chandi had been ordered to destroy these records, apparently because the key participant, Lakhbir Singh Rode, may have been an Indian agent. However, he had preserved these records in secret.

The tapes and statements have been handed over to the RCMP and the John C. Major Commission of Inquiry reinvestigating the Kanishka blast, as part of a comprehensive report prepared by the Punjab Human Rights Organisation (PHRO), a Chandigarh-based NGO that conducted interviews of Parmar’s associates over seven years. Tehelka reports that "the PHRO’s Principal Investigator Sarbjit Singh and lawyer Rajvinder Singh Bains flew to Canada along with Harmail in June and produced their findings before the Commission’s counsels"[1].

Lakhbir Singh Rode, who was the head of the banned International Sikh Youth Federation, is now alleged to be living in Lahore.[1]

The Punjab Human Rights Organisation (PHRO) has also stated that Rode was a undercover Indian Agent and that Parmar was murdered in order to protect his identity and India's role in the bombing. [1]

Rode is wanted by India according to the Red Corner Interpol notice, A-23/1-1997: for "MINOR OFFENCES: House breaking, theft, damage by fire.", based on investigations into another event by India's Central Bureau of Investigation.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Vikram Jit Singh (issue dated 2007-08-04). "Operation Silence". Tehelka. Retrieved 2007-07-27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Air India and Soft Target

How can you claim a "neutral point of view" on the Air India bombing and not even mention the book Soft Target by two Canadian journalists who covered the case, Zuhair Kashmeri of the Toronto Globe and Mail and Brian McAndrew of the Toronto Star? They made a pretty conclusive case that the Indian government itself was behind the bombings. They even show a conversation with Reyat in which the Indians are trying to give him a story. Oddly, it matches very closely the one he told in court.

Soft Target, which Rep. Edolphus Towns has called "the definitive account of the Air India case," quotes a CSIS official as saying “if you really want to clear the incidents quickly, take vans to the Indian High Commission and the consulates in Toronto and Vancouver, load up everybody and take them down for questioning. We know it and they know it that they are involved.” It shows how the Indian Consul General in toronto had extensive knowledge of the case before the Canadian investigators did and before most people knew that the bombing had occurred. It shows that Babbar Khalsa was infiltrated and controlled by the Indian government. The book is filled with evidence of the Indian regime's involvement.

Furthermore, a book called "Betrayal: The Spy Canada Abandoned" by Daive Kilgour, MP, confirms India's involvement. It shows a Canadian-Polish double agent being approached by operatives of the Indian government asking him to participate in a second bombing because "the first one worked so well."

In the interests of "neutral point of view," the evidence of India's involvement in carrying out the bombing itslef ought at least to be disucssed. But there is no mention of any of it in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.235.114 (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Removed Cleanup Tag

Copyedited the article quite a bit and removed the May 07 cleanup tag. mukerjee (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I think the article still needs a lot of work. One area of need is to present the Canadian view on the alleged Parmar confession (the view that it's not credible and was fully investigated) so as to avoid giving WP:UNDUE weight to an alternative theory. See some sources such as: [2] [3]. Canuckle 19:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't think the cleanup tag can be removed quite yet, just reading through briefly i can see a lot needs to be adjusted For example the order of events in some paragraphs is not quite clear, it seems to be lacking info in some areas and the grammatical tense seems slightly odd, as if it is written in present tense in some areas. It could also do with a picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.152.11 (talk) 15:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Controversy about authenticity of Soft Target (book)

Hi all, there has been a discusionabout the authenticity of this particular book, which claims that Indian government had penetrated the sikh millitant organisations in canada and had staged the bombings of Flight 182 to malign the pro khalistan movement. Please contribute your thoughts, ideas, comments here so as to keep the discussion unfragmented. thanks LegalEagle (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Article

I am curious as to who died in this incident? The article doesn't say. Was it mostly Indians? Canadians? If Canadians, how many of them were of Indian descent? And how many of Sikh descent? I mean, the article talks about the extent to which the Canadian public considers it a "Canadian tragedy", and I can't really come to any conclusion without knowing who was on the plane. Who was on the plane??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.139.97 (talk) 17:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Exactly, all of the so called Canadians were actually ethnic Indians. So I would not consider this as a Canadian tragedy, just because they Indians and it did not happen over the Canadian skies.

Norum (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

December 07 I agree that we should add something into the first paragraph about Sikh separatism. However in the past this article was the target of an edit war where anything negative of Sikh separatism was deleted. I've put back in the mention of Tara Singh Hayer which was deleted without any reason. I suggest that a recipient of the Order of British Columbia who was murdered while under RCMP protection for giving an affidavit regarding this case definitely warrants inclusion in this page. I suspect his removal was done by those upset about a negative portrayal of Sikhs. If this is not the case than let's have a discussion here on the talk page. Anyway disagree?

All this article and the likely cause of the bombing is incredibly easy to miss. There should be something about sikj seperatism in the 1st paragraph. 216.165.12.71 21:31, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Feb 06

A previous author had added a NPOV tag but there was no previous discussion on NPOV here on the talk page.

"The above label is meant to indicate that a discussion is ongoing, and hence that the article contents are disputed and volatile. If you add the above code to an article which seems to be biased to you, but there is no prior discussion of the bias, you need to at least leave a note on the article's talk page describing what you consider unacceptable about the article."

So if there's something unnaceptable on this article let's bring it up and change the wording to something better, rather than just flagging a whole section without mentioning anything specific. As far as I can tell there are citations to back up any statements made in the "What the Canadian Government Knew" section.

Jan 27

The previous author had quoted the deaths of over 10,000 in the riots following Gandhi's death. I've moved the decimal place over one and included a link to the BBC article on the subject. If there is another reliable source for that figure than let's include a refrence.

In the suspects area of the page, an author had placed in another refrence to the riots following Gandhis death. However being as we have already elaborated on the situation in the Punjab previously in the article it doesn't seem to make sense to mention it yet again and more importantly seems to condone those statements he made.

Other than those two edits I've also added links to the BBC's articles on the golden temple raid and the riots.

I believe it's important that this article does not fall victim to the many other Sikh articles on Wikipedia that are flagged for clean-up and NPOV, being as how this is page is number 4 on google's results for "air india flight 182". So if anyone is making changes to the content, let's please either note exactly what the content change is in the talk page, or at the very least make some mention of it in the Edit Summary.

July 27

Yes, that looks much better. I have combined the last two paragraphs on the authors, capitalized the title of the book, italicized the publication names, corrected the spelling of the book in the external link section, and fixed some comma splices-- no doubt just the result of the removal of the plagiarised clauses. Thanks for your help. -ALC

July 25th

I agree 100% with Aconnelly, also parts of the Indian government theory were taken from http://www.formac.ca/main_book.php?tabpage=authors&id=481, the plagirized parts have been removed, and the section edited to seem less like a promotion of the book, also the link to the book's website was added to the external links section.

If anyone disagrees please state the objections here.

If not can we remove the bias?

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Air India Flight 182 → Kanishka bombing —

  • The article is about the bombing of the flight on 23 June 1985 and not about the flights on the Montral-London-Delhi-Bombay route in general.
  • While sources on the bombing usually mention that it occurred on the Air India Flight 182, the event itself is typically referred to as Kanishka bombing AFAIK (eg: SATP, Rediff, Deccan Herald, Times of India, ...).

Abecedare (talk) 00:57, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Since apparently the event is named differently in India, Canada, etc, what would you both think of moving the article to Air India Flight 182 bombing, so that the first sentence can include the alternate names ("Kanishka bombing", "Air India bombing", etc). At present there are over a 100 articles that link to this one through the Air India Bombing redirect, but the article lead does not even mention that name, which seems to be popular outside India. Abecedare (talk) 00:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
  • If your main rationale is your first point ("Air India Flight 182" is a regularly-scheduled flight, not one single occurance) then I wouldn't disagree, but I'd want to have someone familiar with the WP:AVIATION naming conventions to confirm that this is legit. After all, I'm sure that a large number of aviation disasters were on flight numbers currently in use; this issue is likely far-reaching (and may have already been discussed). I made a note of this discussion at WP:AVIATION.
  • I don't oppose including "Kanishka bombing" or "Air India bombing" in the introductory sentence, even in bold. Go ahead and boldly add them as you see appropriate. -M.Nelson (talk) 00:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

alternative theories

This news section should be trimmed down to like a paragraph, it is entirely too long.--Profitoftruth85 (talk) 13:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Largest mass murder in Canadian history?

This statement should be removed without a reliable source. It happened in Ireland. Yeah, Canadians were involved, but they were involved in the September 11 bombing, too. Wouldn't that have been the largest mass murder, by this logic? In the Legacy section, a poll is mentioned in which only 48% of Canadian respondents consider this "a Canadian tragedy". That would make it a minority viewpoint. Per section 5.1 of WP:FRINGE, it should not have such an "important" position in the lead. I would remove (or move) it myself if the article wasn't browser-freezing big. Could someone else do it? Thanks. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:40, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

26 Canadians were killed in 9/11 vs. 280 here, and 48% support cannot be considered a fringe theory. I've found reliable news sources that call this the largest or worst. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I disagree with those sources, but no, that doesn't matter. They are reliable. One should be enough, I think. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Impact on Canadian Indian community

Please be sure to research and see if you can find information on how Air India Flight 182 impacted those communities? How many families were affected? Were any Canadian Indian community leaders on board? I also know that Canadian officials made condolences to India without acknowledging the Canadian Indian community. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

List of AI182 passengers who lived in and around Ottawa

It would be interesting to get more RS coverage on where the Air India 182 passengers lived. I found this listing of Ottawa area passengers: http://ottawacitizen.com/entertainment/area-residents-on-air-india-flight-182 - http://www.webcitation.org/6TfF7bwl9 - I do not know how many went to Toronto to board AI181 (which became AI182) or how many went to Montreal. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

AI182 Cork

This source is about AI182 families' positive reception to how the Irish helped them. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

AI182 family articles

Another one I found. I don't know what use it would have...

Also: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/pco-bcp/CP32-89-1-2008E.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6TfGozFSe is the AI182 family reaction document from the Canadian government. French: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/pco-bcp/CP32-89-1-2008F.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/6TfGwEeNO

It does say families still do the pilgrimage to Ireland WhisperToMe (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Family organization

The family association is the "Air India Victims Families Association" - French name : "Association des familles des victimes du vol 182 d'Air India" WhisperToMe (talk) 09:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Accuracy of nationality of victims

The current (Sept2014) list of victims by nationality is sourced by a dead-link to CBC, an archived version lists names but not nationality. The table indicates no citizens of India and only 1 of 22 crew members. Yet the text in the article says 24 victims were Indians. Is there a more reliable source for the breakdown by nationality? Salim Jawa's book website says:

  • There were 160 citizens of Canada, more than 100 nationals of India and 22 Americans on board among others.

Canuckle (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

@Canuckle: Dual citizenship may complicate such lists (see MH17's citizenship list as an example). Maybe one of the books discusses the citizenships in detail, and if so this information would be very useful. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

8.4 On Parole - Discrepency

I found a discrepancy between Contents 8.4 - On Parole and the Global News version of the same events. Wiki 8.4 ------ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_182#On_Parole Global News --- http://globalnews.ca/news/2478873/inderjit-singh-reyat-only-person-convicted-in-connection-to-air-india-bombing-released/ One claims 6 years in jail; the other 20!! I think the difference is important enough to justify a correction! My original research into even more obscenities committed by the RCMP and for way more than $130 mill. needs this accurate figure. Right now it is referencing both Wiki and Global. The reason I took the time to write on the Talk section is because the entire Universe knows Wiki, but only Canadians know about Global News.

If anyone is curious about my original research and the obscenities mentioned above, he/she is more than welcome to contact me at danleonida@yahoo.com (main email) with CC (please) to danleonida55@gmail.com and d_leonida@hotmail.com. My activities being what they are, I'm sure people will believe me when I say that my email accounts developed a "mind of their own"! Thx. Dan Leonida — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.53.180.110 (talk) 23:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 20 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Speculation of Indian government involvement

Recent edits have revived the speculations of conspiracy theory involving the Indian government control. These theories were added/discussed/removed previously, see above for discussion from 2007. The new claims are using the Commission of Inquiry into the Investigation of the Bombing of Air India Flight 182 Research Studies – Volume 1 as a reference. This document is indeed a RS, but I can find nothing in the 236 pages that supports these claims. I have removed the claims from the article until a reference can be found. Loopy30 (talk) 14:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Air India Flight 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

2007 events needs to be updated

There are many things going on with regards to Air India case in Canada right now. Recently a police officer testifies that racism was also involved in the case. New 2007 info: 1. There were numerous warnings given by the Indian government to the Canadian government just a day before the bombing. 2. Some top officials in the Canadian security forces neglected the warnings. 3. There were several failures in security systems such as electronic bomb detectors on the day of the incident, which is unusual. 4. For the last time the fight was warn in Toronto airport but before the police arrived with the sniff dog, someone has given permission to take off.

Could someone with more valid and strong evidence, update the timeline. I know this is what happening but I have no strong evidence to prove the new developments. (That’s why I don’t want to edit the article.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.164.156 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Source

This is a good source that might need to be incorporated into the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profitoftruth85 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

in the armed struggle against the Indian government

in the armed struggle against the Indian government

I thought this was in a biased article on Parmar, but it is here in THIS article.

"the" 'armed struggle' of WHOM? Some now independent nation?

"armed struggle" was a fave expression of whom in The 1970's in Canada  ??

How long can such BS stand unedited in an article on mass murder by terrorists on Wikipedia ??

47.55.81.144 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

 Done armed struggle Changed to -> militancy. you could have done that yourself. --DBigXray 20:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Victim table

Hi User:Spintendo regarding this edit[4], you have removed the inline refs. did you check each one. I believe the nationality info in the table is also from the refs listed here on this table or the article. the might have been omitted to reduce the cluttering in the table. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Victims' nationalities

I have reverted the victims' table's nationalities back to its pre-2009 state. The problem originates from vandalism back in March 2009, and has gone unchecked for more than 10 years now. Jay D. Easy (talk) 16:53, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jay D. Easy: All good, looks like there was a lot of faffing going on with that table. OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 13:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

"Sikh" Terrorists

It seems slightly wrong to label these terrorists as Sikh. Is there some way to refer to their political beliefs instead? Sikh separatists, maybe? Or whatever the adjective form of Khalasa is? It seems analogous to not use the word Muslim in connection to terrorism but to instead use the word Isalmist. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjarboni (talk • contribs) 14:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@Gjarboni: Generally one should see what the established media about the case (published books, newspaper articles, and journal articles) describe the terrorists as and follow that. Anyway the terrorists were a part of Babbar Khalsa and their aim was for Khalistan so one could identify them through the group name and/or as "pro-Khalistan" too. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Has how the Bomb got onto the plane got anything to do with this article?

Does the fact that Jennie Adams the Ticket agent who let the terrorists bag and bomb on to the plane when the terrorist had no ticket and therefore the bag should not have been allowed onto the plane according to the anti terrorist rules at the time! Should it be in the article as it the ONLY reason the plane was blown up by the terrorist bomb that should not have been allowed on the plane!--HalloHelloHalloHello (talk) 22:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

@HalloHelloHalloHello: Probably not that significant. The requirement to reconcile baggage with passengers actually being on a flight was not in operation at the time, it being introduced in 1987. This link [5] discusses this in some detail. While the bags should not have been checked in because the subsquent flight was not "open" this appears to be an administative error rather than any break in security rules in place at the time. Andrewgprout (talk) 23:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

"Probably not that significant." The only reason the bomb was on the plane is not significant?

"The requirement to reconcile baggage with passengers actually being on a flight was not in operation at the time"


Yes it was! She let on baggage that was not ment to on the plane as he did not have a ticket.

That article affirms she broke the security rules, the official investigation also found she broke rules to let the bag on without the passenger having a ticket! "Adams initially refused to through-check Singh’s dark-brown hard-side Samsonite because the connecting flight was still waitlisted." From your article.

"subsquent flight was not "open""

NO she should have not booked it in as he did not have a ticket! This is the point! https://www.flyertalk.com/articles/what-to-do-when-your-flight-segment-is-waitlisted.html "When your flight is waitlisted, you don't necessarily have a confirmed seat aboard the flight" Not ticket yet! If he did have a ticket they would have removed the baggage when he did not join the flight (which was done even back then) as plane bombings existed before 1985.

Does that change your view? Since clearly her failing to follow the rules is the reason the airplane got downed by a bomb!HalloHelloHalloHello (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

This is well covered already in the article - I'm unsure how you can improve it or really what you are trying to say. The requirement for security reasons that people must travel with their bags was not in force in 1985 (and I remember 1985) - it was this incident that was one of the reasons such a rule was subsequently introduced - please see the link I gave above that clearly says this. Andrewgprout (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

David Ayre

At the top of the article it says ""David Ayre" redirects here. It is not to be confused with David Ayer, David Ayers, or David Ayres."

Why does that redirect here? There is no mention of anyone by that name in the article. I'm just curious/confused so if anyone reading this has any insight I'd love to know.

76.67.135.51 (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

There was a bio on this person, relevant edits from 2 March 2011 here. – wbm1058 (talk) 03:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The hatnote was added by this 24 February 2020 edit, related to David Ayres night as an NHL emergency backup goaltender on February 22, 2020. – wbm1058 (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
After removing disambiguation links from other article hatnotes, there is one remaining mainspace link to David Ayre, from 2009 Jelajah Malaysia. This is a New Zealand cyclist (obviously no relation to Flight 182). – wbm1058 (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
I've deleted the redirected biographies of David Ayre, Raymond Kobzey, and Willy Laurie as they were deemed unnotable CSIS agents over a decade ago. I'm not aware that these three agents were actually ever mentioned in the Air India Flight 182 (other than the "redirects here" hatnote), though I haven't done a thorough history search. @Sherurcij: if you ever decide to come out of retirement, feel free to request a WP:REFUND. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:29, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Page has been vandalized.

The page appears to have been vandalized by a conspiracy theorist. The article now characterizes the bombing as a false flag attack by the Indian government. 71.220.133.81 (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Air_India_Flight_182/Archive_1&oldid=1178808504"