This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Age of Enlightenment is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
> As a spill-over of the Enlightenment, nonsecular beliefs expressed first by Quakers and then by Protestant evangelicals in Britain and the United States emerged. To these groups, slavery became "repugnant to our religion" and a "crime in the sight of God."
This is just completely wrong. Slavery was condemned by the early Christian church and Paul in the Bible clearly says do not be a slave and asks in philemon for them to free slaves. Europe mostly ended slavery and moved to serfs so it wasn't new to begin with and the idea stemmed from Christianity. What probably was new was the capitalist conceptions of slavery which seemed to tie freedom to economic freedom or the ability to buy slaves. Slavery increased under capitalism and liberal, i.e. individualist, states while slavery was acted against in Christianity for millennia. I think this statement should be corrected. 122.45.15.68 (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... no! Archaeological evidence shows that Christian churches did own slaves (slaves of that church). So, your claim is wrong.
The Sola Scriptura ground for abolitionism is weak. The Sola Scriptura ground for allowing slavery is strong.
Also, it is preposterous to speak of what Christians think, same as it is preposterous to speak of what Americans think, or of what the Swedes think.
"it is preposterous to speak of what Christians think" To paraphrase one of my favorite comedians, the proper question would be: "Do Christians think?" That religion has had two millenia of disputes over weird interpretations of the same texts. Dimadick (talk) 08:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then what about the church continually fighting against slavery? You have Anselm specifically petitioning Henry I to stop the slave trade in 1102. How can that be a newly developed idea I it pre-existed the Enlightenment by almost half a millennia?
> Anselm also obtained a resolution against the British slave trade.
You're can't extrapolate your position to be that the church reconstituted itself against slavery due to the Enlightenment. It's not only extremely inaccurate, it contradicts historical evidence. It stays edited until a proper edit can happen. 1.220.224.228 (talk) 06:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This papal bull was at least a century before the earliest argued date for the Enlightenment (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimis_Deus) which clearly prefigures Cartesian rationalism and seeks abolition of all and any indigenous people in America, found or not found, Christian or not.
>After 313, when Constantine legalized Christianity within the Roman Empire, Church teachings concerning charity and justice began influencing Roman laws and policies. Pope Callixtus I (bishop of Rome 218–222) was a slave in his youth.[3] Slavery decreased with multiple abolition movements in the late 5th century.
the text " As influence on the Enlightenment...This ideal eventually led to the abolition" is very vague and badly sourced. Cite 63 deals with the 19th century after the Age of Enlightenment ended, and cite #64 is about Adam Smith does not mention religion. So I deleted the passage. Rjensen (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Criticism of religion and deism were fashionable, but not atheism. For Enlightenment philosophers "atheist" was a slur used against them rather than a rationally defensible position. tgeorgescu (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
