Talk:Afanasievo culture

Untitled Comment

In the overwhelmigly Mongoloid surroundings, the Afanasyevo tribes belonged to the so-called paleo-European stock (Great Soviet Encyclopedia' sentry on Afanasyevo Culture). Perhaps this information is worthy of inclusion in our article? --Ghirlandajo 20:43, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

How old is this entry??2A02:8108:9640:AC3:6DFD:8A4F:5AB8:28FD (talk) 07:18, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

from the sources I came up with from a websearch, I'd say the actual extension of the culture looks about thusly. The exact delineation is probably not even known, I suspect. They can easily be the Proto-Tocharians, situation and timeframe fit perfectly (loss of contact with Yamna from about 3500). dab (ᛏ) 14:45, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Name

• Should this article be at Afanasievo, or Afanasyevo instead? Both have more google hits than Afanasevo (3,900; 1,840; vs 1,370) and google book hits (22, 7, 5). The Cambridge History of China and Charles Higham's Early Cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia both use Afanasievo; we should probably use the official Russian spelling of the name, if anyone knows what that may be--Confuzion 18:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed, the Wikipedia entry is misspelled. The English-language references and scholarship (e.g. the cited resources for the entry like Mallory, Mair and Anthony) all use Afanasievo. In fact the content under the misspelled "Afanasevo culture" entry uses the Afanasievo spelling. Jacobfisher.treo (talk) 14:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

In ALL romanization systems of Russian, except "Passport" (see Romanization of Russian) the "ь" (here in "Афана́сьевская культу́ра") is transliterated by variants of " ' ". Anything else is in fact misspelled. Nevertheless, for reasons of traceability from misspellings in the literature, these should be added as "misspelled". HJHolm (talk) 07:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Reference

The cited work 'The Tarim Mummies' by Mallory and Mair is probably the most up to date reference in English for this pre-historic culture, and in the light of this the reference in the Great Soviet Encyclopaedia above can be considered very outdated. The authors make clear that the presence of Indo-European pastoralists (Tocharians) in Central East Asia, specifically in the Tarim Basin and Turfan, preceded by many centuries that of the Chinese and the Turkic tribes, although the Tocharians were ultimately affected quite radically by the Hsiung-Nu, and the expansion of various Turkic tribal groupings in the early centuries CE.

In reading Mallory's and Mair's book I felt that I would personally have benefited from a basic knowledge and understanding of the historic climatology of the regions in question which were, regrettably, scarcely touched upon, apart from the references to 'oasis agriculture'. Geoff Powers (talk) 16:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Recent POV-pushing (inserting non-RS) and edit warring

Diffs: [1], [2], [3]. This user tries to insert his POV and false/wrong content using an unreliable source. --Zyma (talk) 19:27, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Etnocentrism

This article is clearly etnocentrist and one sided. I just added a published sources and at the moment removed. User Zyma is keep vandilism on Andronovo and Afanasevo articles. This artcile need to be a third side users and objective admins. Thanks Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your "source"[4], which includes no mention of volume number or page number, is a picture of books, with an introduction written by Hasan Celal Güzel, a Turkish journalist and politician, who has no academic standing in the field of archaeological culture. I see nothing from your "source" that can be used as a reliable source. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Hasan Celal Güzel just an editor of encyclopedia.(one of editors) Not a writer of sentence. You should be know; a couple histerical user obsessively unrevert my edits. If I add page number, will you support this source in Andronova and this article? Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Why aren't you using secondary sources for this? If this is so academically well-known and acknowledged, then I am sure there would be secondary sources written by specialized academics and not some obscure "encyclopedia" edited by a journalist/politician.

"The arrival of representatives of the Afanas'evo culture in Siberia, Tuva and Mongolia is viewed as the first wave of the migration of the Indo-European-Tocharians eastward...." -- The Origin of the Indo-Iranians, Elena Efimovna Kuzʹmina, page 252.

"Some archaeologist have interpreted the Early Bronze Age Afanasevo culture as Indo-Iranian and Europoid...", -- Ambiguous Images: Gender and Rock Art, Kelley Hays-Gilpin, page 192.

I found 2 sources stating Indo/European/Iranian for the Afanasevo culture, both written by specialized academics. What I did not find was "proto-Turks" or "Turkic" for the Afanasevo culture. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear: I have removed Yagmurlukorfez recent addition, which seems like a continuation of the previous fringe promotion displayed above. The claim of the Afanasevo being of "mixed Europoid and Mongoloid stock througout its South Siberian range" contradicts not only the vast majority of quality sources, but even the scholar Yagmurlukorfez claims to be citing, Valery Alexeyev. Krakkos (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Tarim mummies

The sentence

"Yet, Tarim mummies are genetically closer to Andronovo culture than to Yamnaya culture or Afanasevo culture."

a minor tweak of the original added by User:Ilber8000, is sourced to two articles, Haak et al (2015) and Allentoft et al (2015). However, Haak (which is focussed on European origins) does not mention Afanasevo, Andronovo or the Tarim. Allentoft says Androvno is clearly distinct from Afanasevo and Yamnaya, which are genetically indistinguishable (p169), and mentions Mallory&Mair's suggestion that Afanasevo could be the origin of the Tocharians in the Tarim (p171), but has no mention of Tarim mummies. Kanguole 13:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks; I've reverted myself. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Wording

"Afanasevo were genetically indistinguishable from Yamnaya people"
Shouldn't it be grammatically improved? Maybe, the Afanasevans? Or the Afanasevo? Or the Yamna people?--Adûnâi (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I dared to correct some more stylistic nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:7425:8AFD:E06A:C278 (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Afanasevo culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030827012358/http://members.chello.at/suedtirolerplatz/ethnologie/gesamtversionzas1_7.doc to http://members.chello.at/suedtirolerplatz/ethnologie/gesamtversionzas1_7.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Repin BEFORE Yamnaya

"from the pre-Yamnaya culture Repin culture" - So now changed according to the cited Anthony (2007=2010).2A02:8108:9640:AC3:40BD:40E1:A051:A933 (talk) 06:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

I do not understand this edit, there is nothing in Wikipedia on the Repin culture, but according to Wikipedia the predecessor of Yamnaya is the Khavalynsk-culture! Do we no longer think this is correct? If so, than that article should be changed and an article on this Repin culture should be written. Without those edits, we only add to confusion. I have (at last) ordered the book by Anthony, hoping to understand these relations at last. If I read it I can make an attempt to solve this. I totally agree with Anthony it has to be a pre-Yamnaya culture from where the Afanasievo people came (in contrast to the picture and and article on PIE), to be in the Altai mountains in the middle of the fourth millennium, surely they must have been on the move by 4000 BCE. PS I very much like the map dab made, can it be included in the article?--Codiv (talk) 10:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Anthony has Khavalynsk and Repin in the same area (lower Volga), both antecedents of Yamnaya. The dates cited for Late Khavalynsk sites are a bit earlier than Repin, but these may not be comprehensive. Kanguole 11:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The chronological sequence is Hvalynsk/Khvalynsk - Repin (contained in the following wiki) - Yamnaya (A-B) - Catacomb.HJHolm (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Haplogroup terminology

Because the long branch names tend to be changed every year, it is better to rely upon the defining main SNP. Thus I combined "Haplogroup R-M269|R1b1a1a2a(2)". See ISOGG for more information.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:39F5:C3F3:38E5:BB5D (talk) 08:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC) Some ignorant seems to have reverted this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:C8B8:D9A7:61A8:6C50 (talk) 15:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

No vehicles proven

The statement referring to Mallory, is sloppily quoted and thus completely misleading. Correctly cited [differences capitalized], Mallory wrote, "Artistic representations of wheeled vehicles ENGRAVED ON STONE have been found within the region and have been attributed BY SOME to the Afanasevo culture (ALTERNATIVELY TO THE LATER OKUNEVO CULTURE)." This is as much as nothing. A representative overview of oldest vehicles and their probable relation to Indo-Europeans can be found in Holm (2019).2A02:8108:9640:AC3:A558:55B6:22F:781E (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Genetics

Many thanks for the time-consuming work of extracting the genetics from the different sources. However, please note that newer studies generally include the results of older ones, which should not lead to the many undetected repetitions of the SNPs found, not only in this article.HJJHolm (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

I added a summary, avoiding these doubles/overlappings.HJJHolm (talk) 08:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

New article on populational genetics of Xinjiang, showing some presence of Afanasievo: https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/7/14/eabd6690 189.122.57.144 (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Migration map questionable

The map has several shortcomings. The author cites Anthony 2007, obviously not noting that Anthony 2007 is outdated because he dated the Afanas'evo migration 400 years later in his 2013 and 2017 papers. Further the author did not recognize that the cited remarks from Eurogenes blog (2017) are unsourced ad-hoc assumptions and complete nonsense. I propose to take the map out until this and more corrections.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:6DFD:8A4F:5AB8:28FD (talk) 07:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

More outdated: "as Leo Klejn, J. P. Mallory and Victor H. Mair have linked the Afanasevans to the Proto-Tocharian language.[4][5][6][7]" J. Mallory (2015) questioned his here cited former assumptions! I will not change the text by myself only to be reverted by some ignorant people.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:A82F:A405:4BC3:2D52 (talk) 14:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

The "Migration of Yamnaya-related people" is contradicted and outdated as reported in the Text by the paper of Zhang et al. 2021!!! HJJHolm (talk) 14:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Genetics, again

The Genetics section heavily highlights uniparental lineages, to the point that Narasimhan et al. (2019) are claimed to have "interpreted these [=Y-DNA/mtDNA-related] results as evidence for a migration from the Pontic–Caspian steppe". All studies cited however mainly focus on full-genome allele-sharing (Narasimhan et al. is all about f₄/f₃-stats) and we should not give undue weight to secondary aspects of our sources. A haplogoup-focused reading of modern genomic studies is something that certain blogs do, but this should not be imitated in WP. @Tewdar and Joshua Jonathan: Any objections if I throw out the haplogroup cruft, or at least put it into a note? Austronesier (talk) 20:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

We certainly shouldn't be stating that, referring to the haplogroups, The authors interpreted these results as evidence for a migration from the Pontic–Caspian steppe if the authors don't actually say this. As far as I can tell, the authors do not state this anywhere in their paper or the supplement, but it is a bit late I suppose... Stick the haplogroupzzz counts in a note, I'll try and find a source that explicitly links the haplogroups to the Afanasievo migration (I think one does exist, somewhere...)  Tewdar  22:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Afanasievo genetics between ca. -3'200 and 2'500 mainly shows R1b-Z2103 with naturally mainly ANE, however, also a spur of WHG admixture in nearly all tested individuals (Narasimshan, Wang), from which we may conclude upon an origin from at least Eastern Europe, if not Yamnaya. Anything else would require some improbable parallel mutations. HJJHolm (talk) 06:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

In addition: The sentence in sub para "Successors", "The Yamnaya and Afanasevo cultures were also found to be genetically distinct from the Andronovo culture.[5]" must be wrong because Allentoft (2018: 169) clearly state, "The Early Bronze Age Afanasievo culture in the Altai-Sayan region is genetically indistinguishable from Yamnaya, confirming an eastward expansion across the steppe (Figs 1 and 3b; Extended Data Fig. 2b and Extended Data Table 1), ...". This contradiction requires correction of that miscitation.HJJHolm (talk) 07:37, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

This must be a misunderstanding. The statement is about the genetic difference between the Andronovo and Afanasievo populations. I will restore the previous text ("The Yamnaya and Afanasevo cultures were also found to be genetically distinct from the Andronovo culture"), since it is explicitly supported by the source: "The Andronovo culture [...] is genetically closely related to the Sintashta peoples, and clearly distinct from both Yamnaya and Afanasievo. –Austronesier (talk) 08:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Afanasievo and (proto-)Proto-Tocharian

Indo-Europeanists have pursued an appealing narrative for some time now that the arrival of the Afanasievans (allow me to use this simplisitic identification of an archeological cultural complex with the people the associated with it) must somehow be linked to the introduction of the ancestral language of the Tocharian branch of Indo-European to this area. There were of course other (and later) archeological cultures with clear links to the western steppe (= Andronovo) that also expanded to the periphery of the Tarim Basin, but since they are generally held to be the precursors of the Indo-Iranians, this leaves the Afanasievo culture as a plausible candidate for the origin of the Tocharian languages, in spite of the huge temporal gap.

At the moment, we just have name dropping and a citebomb about this hypothesis in the lede section and a short mention in "Successors". Let's do a section about it of its own, with all the recent twists to earlier simplistic narratives (such as the "White Mummies" bullshit that circulated in the media and for which Victor Mair can be held responsible), especially with the groundbreaking paper by Zhang et al. (2021) that comes as a spoilsport to all who try to claim "ownership" of Xinjiang's past. In the end, history belongs to the people of the past that lived through it, and to no one else.

I'll fiddle around with a draft in the next days in my sandbox. Ping me if you're interested in joining. Austronesier (talk) 16:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Dates outdated

Please update to "Poliakov et al.: A Review of the Radiocarbon Dates for the Afanasyevo Culture (Central Asia): Shifting Towards the “Shorter” Chronology. In: Radiocarbon 61-1 , Feb 2019 , S. 243–263; doi:10.1017/RDC.2018.70." Thank You. HJJHolm (talk) 09:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Central Steppe EMBA

@Austronesier: Thanks for the correction regarding the Afanasievo's "leapfrogging" across central central Asia. I did not anticipate that this would be in the very large Supplenentary Info file from Narasimhan 2019 (out of all the references), and so assumed it was just POV. One thing I must say however is that the quote you reference appears to be on page 229, rather than 235. Are we looking at the same file? I downloaded mine from the PubMed link. Regards, - Hunan201p (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

@Hunan201p:I always take layout-dependent details like pagination from the publisher version, since even peer-reviewed accepted versions often are only saved as raw files (*.doc etc.) in repositories. The Science version of the SI[5] has it on p. 235. –Austronesier (talk) 10:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

precededby parameter

The |precededby= parameter is documented in {{infobox archaeological culture}} as The culture that directly preceded this culture in its geographical range. The Repin culture may have been the source of Afanasievo, but it certainly was not within its geographical range. Kanguole 22:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)