Talk:Aevum

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aevum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Medieval philosophy

Seeking Assistance

I am aware that this page, as it currently stands, is a fairly inadequate overview of the concept of aeviternity. It is intended simply as a means of getting the subject onto Wikipedia, so that people who have more expertise on the subject (and who possibly own their own copies of De quattuor coaequaevis) can come and flesh it out. If anybody reading this fits that description, please don't hesitate to come in and start rescuplting the page from the bottom up. -Agur bar Jacé (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would question the academic worth of an almost unknown publisher as a qualified academic historian. It implies OR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.9.109 (talk) 00:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Dates back at least back to Albert" is incorrect

It's MORE correct to say that the concept of aeviternity dates back at least to Boethius. Source: Aquinas, Summa Theogica (I, q.10, a.5). By the way, no valid source was cited for the original claim. The fact that a source talks about Albert and aeviternity doesn't mean the concept originated with Albert. 2601:840:8783:FE40:896:50F4:75EF:E54 (talk) 15:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]