Talk:Aerocapture

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: invalid parameter Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Spaceflight High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aerocapture

Any more detail from Aerobraking that really belongs here? Very illustrative picture. MFago 04:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Math

Can we have some of the math on this and a lot more detail? Gingermint (talk) 04:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture doesn't render properly

The text in the picture doesn't render properly with my browser, I'm using chrome v9.0.597.98 on windows 7. I guess it's because it's an .svg, but the letters are scrunched together and pretty much unreadable, anyone able to fix this? Larryisgood (talk) 15:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I just checked with 'firefox v3.6.13 and that's not rendering it correctly either. When I actually open the .svg in a new window it works fine. Anyone else getting the same problem?Larryisgood (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly called aerobraking?

Aerocapture#In_fiction

Aerocapture within fiction can be read in Arthur C. Clarke's novel 2010: Odyssey Two, in which two spacecraft (one Russian, one Chinese) both use aerocapture in Jupiter's atmosphere to shed their excess velocity and position themselves for exploring Jupiter's satellites. This can be seen as a special effect in the movie version (created by MGM/released by Warner Home Video) in which only a Russian spacecraft undergoes aerocapture (in the film incorrectly called aerobraking), which is demonstrated via special effects.

If they are using aerocapture in Jupiter's atmosphere, they will land on Jupiter's surface. If they are using it on the atmosphere of one of Jupiter's satellites, they will land on that satellite. I haven't seen it, but I'm guessing they are actually using aerobraking on Jupiter's surface, and another method (aerocapture or whatever) to land on its satellite to explore it. Does anyone agree this is indeed correctly called aerobraking, and that the paragraph doesn't even belong in this article? D. F. Schmidt (talk) 03:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]