User talk:Larryisgood

Yoda

LOL! - DVdm (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LAB

Thanks for the note. No problem. You can revert my change. I am still trying to think about the contribution. So, about 1 billion kg of LABs are consumed each year for making detergents, and the article then gets a paragraph on a possible use of for detecting nutrinos? With three specific references? What ran through my mind are two guidelines (the litigious way of arguing on Wikipedia, admittedly): WP:UNDUE and WP:SECONDARY. The list would be a mile long if we indicated every mere thousand or million kg that was used for some kinky use. The UNDUE thing comes from my sense that academicians tend to fill these pages (I am one of them), and they know all kinds of archane "uses", which rarely are uses, just something that they know and are always ready with an armful of primary references. What the LAB article needs is editors who could focus on the 1 billion kg application, but such folks from the real world are an extreme rarity in Wikipedia. A bit of a rant, I know.

BTW, is the secret nutrino detector really used or contemplated?

Cheers,--Smokefoot (talk) 13:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Message added 01:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

WWF

How is "Words With Friends" an irrelevant link? People commonly use #WWF to refer to the game on Twitter. hbdragon88 (talk) 23:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I humbly request your input over on Talk:WWF. hbdragon88 (talk) 05:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Necromone

Refs?

According to who?

WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, see WP:FIRST Chzz ► 22:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may notice I used a 'new page' tag.Larryisgood (talk) 23:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"New page" - doesn't matter; if it's live, it has to meet the basic requirements. If you wanna develop swomething, use a draft page.

I noticed you [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=##chzz on the 'chat', but you left before I would say 'hello'. Chzz ► 23:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hah! Yes, for some reason I thought the chat would be a one-on-one affair. But then it wasn't so I figured I'd just reply here. The draft page might be a good idea, I was not aware of this feature or that this was the protocol. I am relatively new to creating articles. If you feel it is necessary to delete necromone until a more developed version is established on this draft page you speak of, go for it. Larryisgood (talk) 23:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Necromone

The article Necromone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DICDEF - not enough coverage in independent RS to show notabilty - try wikit:Wiktionary, maybe?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 23:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Craning

The article Craning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references cited and none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taylornate (talk) 19:42, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SOFAR channel ref

Hi. You apparently didn't bother read the citation you added. It had to do with fin whales. Not humpbacks. Thanks. SHFW70 (talk) 19:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Larryisgood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Larryisgood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Larryisgood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]