Jump to content

Talk:Aerial Reconfigurable Embedded System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

250 nm?

[edit]

The article refers to the combat range as 250 nanometers? Is this supposed to be 250 kilometers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.12.215.128 (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, corrected to Nautical Miles. TGCP (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No picture

[edit]

There isn't any image on the article. Should there be one? B-) (talk) 19:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No vehicle has been made yet, nor prototypes. If a "free" image showing any potential vehicle can be found, I would say OK until an actual vehicle shows up. TGCP (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud cuckoo land

[edit]

There are far too many stumbling blocks for anything to come of this. The major one is safety. There will be no way of ensuring safety in the heat of battle. We know what trouble governments can get in now over safety, look at the BAE Systems Nimrod MRA4 debacle. I feel a common-sense caption whizzing DARPAs way very shortly.--Petebutt (talk) 04:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Aerial Reconfigurable Embedded System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aerial Reconfigurable Embedded System. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ares disambiguation?

[edit]

i feel like a vehicle both (A) being designed by the military and (B) having the same name as the Greek god of war is more than a coincidence. Original research/speculation, maybe, but Wikipedia also provides disambiguation links even when shared names are purely coincidental. Any objection to putting a note in the article? --71.121.143.10 (talk) 06:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither "Ares" nor "ARES" redirect here, so a hatnote is unnecessary, per WP:HATNOTE. - BilCat (talk) 06:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]