Jump to content

Talk:Adwoa Aboah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Additional sources

[edit]

For expanding the entry:

Seem to be quite a lot more where that came from, too. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relations

[edit]

@Trillfendi: you have reverted my edit to where I removed Matilda Lowther from the relation section of the infobox, even though there is no reliable source to back this claim (Instagram does not count). Aboah has a notable sister, mother, and great-grandfather. Does a notable distant-cousin belong in the infobox? I don't think so. Unless it contributes to her notability in some way. Please find a better source, and I'd ask that until you do, you remove Lowther from the infobox. It is not crucial to her biography. If anything, it should be in the body of the article and not the infobox. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I did not publicly reference Instagram, I put those inside of a note that no one can see unless they view the source whereas in the early life I put an interview where Matilda Lowther calls Adwoa Aboah her cousin; as for Adwoa Aboah, at Matilda Lowther’s birthday party she said she was her cousin along with a bunch of other cousins. On Amy Schumer’s and Chuck Schumer’s articles they are listed as cousins in their respective infoboxes even when she herself said she doesn’t know exactly how closely they are related being that it’s her dad’s cousin. On Yara Shahidi’s and Nas’s articles they are listed cousins even though it’s really her mom’s cousin (yet despite their 28 year age difference, she has known the guy her whole life). On Gabrielle Union’s and Saweetie’s articles they are listed as cousins in their respective infoboxes even though Saweetie’s grandma is Gabrielle Union’s aunt—but Union has acknowledged the fact that they are cousins. Now go a step further... on Nicole Richie’s article, Cameron Diaz is listed as sister-in-law. I could keep going. So it’s quite obvious that when two famous and/or notable people who have a Wikipedia article are related it’s a given that said relation would be included in the infobox as a biographical detail. No one cares about pedantry. And no, listing a relative has absolutely nothing to do with a person’s individual notabolity. I don’t know where one would even come up with that idea. ⌚️ (talk) 18:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]