Jump to content

Talk:Adventure Time season 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAdventure Time season 6 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starAdventure Time season 6 is part of the Seasons of Adventure Time series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 17, 2015Good article nomineeListed
March 22, 2019Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Adventure Time (season 6)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BenLinus1214 (talk · contribs) 23:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will review after El Camino (The Black Keys album). Johanna (aka BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 23:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gen. Quon: Comments

Lead
  • I prefer the construction "The sixth season of the…" as opposed to non-bolded but a lot of FLs don't so it's your choice.
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The third paragraph of the lead is mostly development and cast stuff and the second is mostly reception--do you want to maybe reorganize it a bit and flip? (Obviously, use common sense--i.e. keep the DVD stuff in the third para)
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Development
  • "After the writers pitch the stories…" It's okay that it's copy-pasted from other season articles, but it's a bit awkward as of now. I would use transitional language in the form of a starting clause "Similarly to previous seasons…" or "In the show's traditional writing schedule…" If you can think of a better phrase, be my guest.
    I tried to completely reword all of this.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, I got a good chunk of these taken care of, but I'll come back and try to clean-up the guest cast and episode summary sections.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Probably should be "these studios" because you mention two.
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You probably don't need to link Yuasa's name again when listing all the personnel.
    Changed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why is LandOfOoo.com a reliable source?
    Generally, it's not, but in this case, Jesse Moynihan created an account and created a "Ask Me Anything"-style thread. Since he's a notable primary source, I figured it's OK.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the last sentence, how do you know it was "to ease his departure"?
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You use a lot of social media sources in this section--could you just explain your rationale for this?
    The AT staff is really, really hip to using social media, and they're also very accessible. Via Twitter, Spring.me, and Ask.fm, many a question about production has been answered. Normally, I would shy away from using social media, but since all of the sentences being supported by social media references are generally just production-based facts, I feel like it satisfies WP:SOCIALMEDIA. The show's official (i.e. Cartoon Network and Frederator-sanctioned) production website is also hosted by Tumblr.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cast
  • I know this is really difficult, but can you try to make the long guest stars paragraphs flow better? It's okay if you can't easily--just let me know.
    I'll work on that soon.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Various other characters are voiced by…" Could you give us a few examples?
    Most of the characters don't have names. I tried to clarify what I meant.--~~!~~
Reception
Episodes
  • Take a quick look through some of the prose for this section. Most of it is surprisingly good, but a few of the short summaries might be able to be cut down, as these are all 11 minute episodes.
    I'll comb over them shortly.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The summary of episode 28 is fairly short, bizarre, and informal. Rework that one entirely, I would say.
    Whoops. I didn't notice that one. Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gen. Quon: Okay, I'm done. Looks like a very good article--just a few comments to respond to. Johanna (aka BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 14:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get on this in the next couple of days, and then I'll get to those GA's you requested!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gen. Quon: Everything you've done already looks great--just seems to be a matter of the prose in the cast paragraphs and then I can pass. Johanna (aka BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 13:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to completely reorganized and rewrite it. Is it at least looking better?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Great! I like it a lot more. Pass. By the way, if you have any experience with featured lists, could you possibly interchange one of the forthcoming GA reviews with this FLC? I would really appreciate it. (BTW don't be deterred by the first "oppose, suggest withdrawal" comment--I've fixed all the responses, but the user hasn't edited for a few days--it'll probably be struck). If you aren't comfortable with reviewing a featured list candidate, that's perfectly fine! :) Johanna (aka BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 01:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Adventure Time (season 6). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 39 external links on Adventure Time (season 6). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]