Talk:Adriana Ferreyr

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Brazil: Arts Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Arts in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Robot100 (talk · contribs)
Cruccroc (talk · contribs)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Hap791 (talk) 00:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)there are many articles and web sites that prove that the information contained in the page is factual and accurate. Additional references where added in order to back up those claims.[reply]

This page should be deleted because

Most of the statements within this article are unverifiable. There is merely usage of news reports which quote extracts from IMDB and Linkedin. IMDB and Linkedin are unverifiable sources. Where comments have been made that were verifiable from police statements they have been deleted. Usually by the same IP addresses, HAP791. One of which traces to the university where Ms Ferreyr reputedly studies. JPG usage was also misrepresented by the poster, HAP791.

-- William de Berg (talk) 13:34, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It appears that Ferreyr added most of this wikipedia herself, especially the unsourced parts about her volunteerism and alleged philanthropy 74.101.128.155 (talk) 17:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:R11a16t52q411.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:R11a16t52q411.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article status

The article has been edited and improved. Restoring it to an earlier version that included poor writing, puffery, and other problems is unacceptable. If editors want to improve the article, they can do so. Otherwise, they must take any major changes here to achieve consensus.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus.

Are you reading the same set of comments as the rest of us?

Graeme Bartlett is misquoting WP:EN Jane77765 and Hap791 continue to believe that unsubstantiated sources count as the real thing. Superbob uses exactly the same language as Jane77765 and makes no valid claim to keeping the bio. There are a couple of unsigned Keep voters whom have never made any other contribution other than voting on this screen. Collect merely relies on her being mentioned in Soros news items.

Against that we have 4 votes for delete. ie she is not notable. Cullen shows that the information sources are unsubstantiated.

I view that as a categoric agreement to delete. I believe we have to discount the people misquoting information sources. William de Berg (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, User:Sandstein is a very experienced administrator and I agree with his no consensus close, if you object to the close you have to discuss with him on his talkapge first prior to requesting a deletion review discussion WP:DRV . The best is to slowly make a case here and remove whatever is unverifiable (comment here first and allow users time to find support for incited claims) and in a few weeks ask if there are objections to a renomination and send it back to AFD. Off2riorob (talk) 19:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

False informations

Informations about Ferreyr phylanthropy are unreliable and probably false. Searching the string "Ferreyr Tijuana", only results copied from Wikipedia appear. --79.56.203.59 (talk) 12:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection

I have fully protected the article for 3 days to stop the edit war about what information should be included. However, prior to doing so, I have removed the most recent contentious point. Normally, admins just protect the most recent version, per WP:Protection policy. However, there are a few cases where we are asked to consider article content, and WP:BLP policy is one of them. I am very concerned that an allegation of an allegation of rape, especially when charges were not pressed, is negative information. Furthermore, if we are going to include negative biographical info, it must be verified by very high quality sources...and the Daily Mail rarely meets that requirement. As such, I believe that that before that information is added, you need to take the matter to the BLP noticeboard and get the opinion of uninvolved editors. I'm strictly saying it can't be in the article, but I am saying that we need a clear consensus to show it meets WP:BLP before we add it. I have no opinion on the rest of the disputed information, however. Please discuss that here and try to come to a consensus while the article is protected. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Qwyrxian thanks for your intervention. I also have no opinion on the disputed content, however I do accept that if the daily mail is not regarded as a reliable source, that the previous revision was a violation of WP:BLP. Edit warring rarely resolves a content dispute and on that note I'm off to bed. Best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 13:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infos about Ferreyr philanthropy are completely unsourced, but they are still present in the voice. Lenore (talk) 14:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the entire section, because totally unsourced. --Lenore (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Career

On February 5, someone deleted Adriana Ferreyr's job from her wikipedia article. This is what was deleted:

Ferreyr owns a retail business selling sunglasses and Christmas ornaments through kiosks in malls on the West Coast of the United States.^[1]

12.14.180.12 (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ferreyr physically attacked Soros and his lawyer and assistant during 2014 deposition

George Soros’ ex-girlfriend goes berserk during deposition and smacks the 83-year-old billionaire in the head: court papers, New York Daily News, February 7, 2014, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/george-soros-ex-girlfriend-berserk-deposition-court-papers-article-1.1606326

Soros ex hit him in alleged rampage, New York Post, February 7, 2014, http://pagesix.com/2014/02/07/soros-ex-hit-him-and-lawyer-in-alleged-rampage-at-hearing/

12.14.180.12 (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC) 12.14.180.12 (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sourced - mother's name

The Adriana Ferreyr wikipedia article currently says "Ferreyr was born in Bahia, Brazil, the daughter of Maria Cardoso Borges and Rogério Ferreiro, a civil engineer.[4]" The source provided is http://siterg.terra.com.br/news/2011/10/27/adriana-ferreyr-e-george-soros-tragedia-baiana/

That source does not mention the name "Maria" (the supposed mother of Adriana Ferreyr) but does mention that Ferreyr's father is Rogério Ferreiro.

Because of this, I'm going to delete the mother's name from the Adriana Ferreyr wikipedia article and leave the father's name. 63.247.160.139 (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ Cite error: The named reference nytimes was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[nytimes-1] Cite error: The named reference nytimes was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]