Talk:Adhesive bonding

Metalworking Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polymers (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers articles

Reviewer Note

This draft appears to satisfy notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:46, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concur that the topic is notable. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 06:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

This draft covers the broader topic of adhesion bonding better than the existing article which was specifically stated in its lead as intended to cover a subset of the topic relating to the special techniques used in wafer bonding. The existing article could be renamed, possibly Adhesive bonding of wafers, and this draft could take over as the broader scope article using the existing title. Some splitting and merging may be required as attempts have been made to generalise the exixting article with content that may be more appropriate in this or other articles. @Robert McClenon: for discussion. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 06:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pbsouthwood, User:Feicanews, User:JJMC89 - I think that this is a case where a good-faith effort to redirect what looked like a duplicate draft to the existing article has hidden useful draft content. I will be undoing the redirect so that the draft can be discussed and compared against the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon, I agree, and that looks like an appropriate response. Ping me if I can help. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 08:45, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since the draft is still drawing inappropriate urges to merge, I will rename the original article as I suggested above so that this draft can use the title. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I will now move this draft into mainspace. If anyone has a problem with this, please read both articles, take note of the different scopes, and explain why you think they are so similar that merging would be more appropriate. Then we can have a rational discussion of whether the renamed narrow scope article should be merged into this one. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 05:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]