Talk:Adele Rose
Appearance
A news item involving Adele Rose was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 31 December 2020. |
A fact from Adele Rose appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Adele Rose, the first woman scriptwriter for the British soap opera Coronation Street, went on to write 457 scripts over a period of 37 years? Source: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/womenswork/oral-histories/womens-work-oral-histories/?interview=Adele_Rose "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- ALT1:... that Adele Rose wrote 457 scripts for the British soap opera Coronation Street, more than any other contributor? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
- Comment: expansion started on 30 December 2020
5x expanded by MurielMary (talk) and Espresso Addict (talk). Nominated by MurielMary (talk) at 03:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC).
- Hi MurielMary, review follows: article 5x expanded from 30 December; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; hooks are interesting, mentioned in article (I added an explicit mention of the first female writer claim) and backed up by the sources; I didn't pick up any overly close paraphrasing in a spot check on the sources. I think this just needs a QPQ to be passed - Dumelow (talk) 13:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Dumelow and MurielMary: I've reviewed Veiled Vestal for this QPQ. (I genuinely hadn't realised when I started that the reviewer was also the creator of the QPQ DYK; I'm a gannet for Austen references. I hope this isn't a problem.) Espresso Addict (talk) 01:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I don't think there's a rule against that - Dumelow (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Dumelow and MurielMary: I've reviewed Veiled Vestal for this QPQ. (I genuinely hadn't realised when I started that the reviewer was also the creator of the QPQ DYK; I'm a gannet for Austen references. I hope this isn't a problem.) Espresso Addict (talk) 01:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 150 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages