Jump to content

Talk:Adderbury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Great Concern about Twyford Bridge No 177 due to years of weight & vibration from possibly hundreds of heavy goods vehicles driving over it every single day of the week

[edit]

The deterioration of Twyford Bridge No 177 is of great concern to many local residents, due to years of weight and vibration on this single lane hump backed bridge, from possibly hundreds of Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) driving over this bridge every day of the week, 24 hours a day to go to and from Cherwell Valley Silos and make deliveries to building sites etc. in Kings Sutton. There is a weight restricted railway bridge, quite near to Twyford Bridge No 177, in Kings Sutton and South Northamptonshire Council have signs in the nearby village of Kings Sutton preventing the HGVs from going through Kings Sutton so all HGVs licensed to operate from Cherwell Valley Silos, and delivering goods in Kings Sutton, go back and forth over Twyford Bridge possibly hundreds of times per day. We hope the Canal River Trust can save this beautiful bridge at Twyford Wharf, Oxfordshire — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.145.187 (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox; it has certain core policies, such as neutral point of view and verifiability. Has this topic been covered in, for example, the Banbury Guardian or Oxford Times? --Redrose64 (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Single Lane Listed Bridge at Twyford Wharf has been damaged again by a vehicle and could be of concern to boats passing beneath it on the Oxford Canal - October 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.180.40 (talk) 16:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/four-die-as-teenagers-car-careers-into-canal-1573958.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.180.40 (talk) 07:58, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twyford, Oxfordshire Merge

[edit]

Twyford, Oxfordshire is a stub article which should be merged into this article here or the Oxford Canal article, or both.--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dthomsen8: It's a WP:POVFORK. There is some slow-burn dispute here, see for example User talk:78.143.206.176 and the activities of TwyfordOxfordshire (talk · contribs) and 109.150.145.187 (talk). There is little to merge. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see, but as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, I am concerned with the copyedit tag. Can any of these editors go ahead and do the copyediting requested?--DThomsen8 (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"These editors" being people with an axe to grind? I redirected it, that's dealt with the {{copy edit}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the redirect. I hope it sticks.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Adderbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adderbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adderbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Adderbury&oldid=1204521917"