Talk:Addenbrooke's Hospital

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Health Service (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Health Service, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Health ServiceWikipedia:WikiProject National Health ServiceTemplate:WikiProject National Health ServiceNational Health Service articles

Hospitals High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

how many beds does it have?

I know this is petty and useless, but as an Addenbrook (whose father told him that the "e" wss dropped overboard on the Mayflower), seeing any mention of Addenbrook(e) is a fun thing. There aren't many of us around.

May 15th - I have added a photograph on licence by cambridge2000 and removed the stub category due to the expansion of the article. Michael Dart

October 06 - Added fully licensed image. D Dinneen

Considering moving the biomedical campus section into a seperate article.

Internal directory

Surely which ward is where counts as Trivia as far as a general encyclopaedia is concerned and should be removed from the article ?David Ruben ^Talk 22:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

addition point/guideline is that Wikipedia is not a directory listings and presumeably this also covers an organisation's internal directory David Ruben ^Talk 22:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Internal Directory

After reading suggested articles I came across this sentence:

Don't simply remove such sections; it may be possible to integrate some items into the article in a more organized fashion.

Therefore I feel that the table be restored, and a note left here asking editors to perhaps write a little more about it?

Tiddly Tom 18:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transport

I was bold and updated the transport section to include a few additional information, such as the Park and Ride links to Addenbrooke's, a new cycle path from Great Shelford, building of a new car park and the new access road. I've also added a Reference section. Hope that's all right since I'm still quite new to Wikipedia editing. C2uk 17:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, corrected the spelling of 'cawley' to 'cowley'. Tiddly Tom 19:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, appreciate it. C2uk 06:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Hospital Plans

Thanks to C2uk for correcting my errors, I knew there would be some :P I dont know wether it should be Childrens or Children's or Childrens' as it doesent belong to any child or children? Tiddly Tom 17:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patient confidentiality/whistle blowing controversy

i'm trying to work up a section on patient z, recently featured in the news, who as both a patient and employee (she was a junior doctor) of the hospital recently won a long winded legal action against the hospital. the only source on the internet i can find only shows half the story and is [1] and [2]--Mongreilf (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aborted babies

How relevant is this entire section? It seems like a tabloid style scandal which hasn't really had any lasting effects and is based only on one source. Time to delete? Abc30 (talk) 20:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Car parks (outdated)

The bit about the new multi-storey car park is, presumably, outdated and ref. 5 is a [[Template::dead link]]. I imagine the situation has changed, but though having googled around can't find any detailed info. I wonder if there is deliberate queitism on the part of Addenbrokes about how many spaces are available etc to discourage people from driving. Anyway, I have left it be but wonder if someone more "in the know" (or who manages to search better than me) could update this maybe. At the top it says there are about 3000 spaces then farther down they are getting fewer then there will be a new multi-storey. Well presumably even with over-run that is in place now? So what is the capacity now?

I think also "and disabled parking" needs to be qualified with "extra" or something because it sounds like you can't be both a visitor and disabled, etc!

Best wishes SimonTrew (talk) 14:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

There is a reference (no 6) to an educational website I run which does not really seem to be the correct source for the relevant piece of information, although that page does contain links to various sources of information - for example the FICM link. Should it be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.151.118.130 (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Addenbrooke's Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Addenbrooke's Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923200030/http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Addenbrookes-stars-TV-series/story-22744109-detail/story.html to http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Addenbrookes-stars-TV-series/story-22744109-detail/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aerial Photograph very outdated

Could we look to getting the aerial site photograph updated please? Several prominent features of the hospital site are not shown and features such as the bus station and newer multistorey car parks are missing. 86.187.167.23 (talk) 21:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]