Talk:Act! (Italy)

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"To Do!" or "Do!"?

What about moving the article to an English name? "To Do!" or "Do!"? I'm quite unconvinced that "To Do!" is the best translation.

The literal translation is "To do" because Fare is an infinitive verb. However I think that in this case the original italian name is better such as title for the page --Maremmano (talk) 20:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd much prefer an English language title, but fare is an ambitious word when it comes to translation – it could as equally translate as Make! or Act! (the latter in the sense of action). I prefer Act! over Do! or Make!, personally speaking.--Autospark (talk) 17:53, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As usual, I also greatly prefer an English name, especially because we already have Act to Stop the Decline. Regarding both parties, however, I'm quite doubtful on "act" instead of "do" or "make". No problem with moving the article to "Act!" in the meantime. Any opinion by User:Nick.mon, who usually edits articles on Italian political parties, along with Autospark, Maremmano and me? --Checco (talk) 13:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that, if we want to translate the name in English, "Act!" could be a good title for this article. So I give my consensus to move the page! Nick.mon (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to move the article to Act! per consensus and consistency. --Checco (talk) 08:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

However I do not understand you, you refused to translate the name of a party when there are most of the sources that use the English name, while here you decide to use a mistranslation that is not used by any source...--Maremmano (talk) 16:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]