Jump to content

Talk:Accuracy International AWM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger

[edit]

This article should be merged with Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare as the sub-model doesn't merit a whole article of it's own. /BP 81.225.216.15 (talk) 19:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

I have removed this section, because lists of trivia do not belong in wikipedia (See What Wikipedia is not— WP:NOT). Please feel free to add such information on the two pages List of firearms in video games and List of firearms in films. Deon Steyn 12:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with this, as although its relationship with popular media (such as CS) may be viewed as obnoxious or petty (especially by gun enthusiasts who look down on these sorts of things), it has undeniabley still worked its way into mainstream (and definately internet) culture and definately deserves a "in popular culture" section, or at the very least a link in "See Also" to one or both of the lists you provided above. 74.12.81.178 06:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, it doesn't say anything in WP:NOT about not listing trivia. OSm people may actually find it interesting to see it is listed in CS:S. Tom (N wales)

It is named the AWP to avoid copyright infringment, much like every other gun's actual name in the game. M4A1 is called a Maverick M4A1 and the AK-47 is called a CV-47

The one in Counter-Strike is not named AWM, it's named AWP. ClanCC (T / C) 07:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hey, you've got it all wrong. You jsut have no knowledge of any firearm whatsoever!!!
The "AWP" is a version of the Arctic Warfare Magnum called the Arctic Warfare POLICE. Valve put this in-game, because since Counter Terrorists are similar to police, they would use the police version. The main difference in the police version is the caliber, it fires standard .308 instead of .338 LM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.189.245 (talk) 01:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G24

[edit]

German Special Forces like KSK and Fernspäher do use a version called G 24 with .50 BMG (12,7 mm x 99). Therefore I don't see any problem adding this information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wombat0815 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy international AW(S)M rifles are not produced in .50 BMG/12.7x99mm NATO. The action of this particular variant is simply not large enough to handle longer cartridges than the .338 Lapua Magnum. In fact the AWSM magazines can not handle the .338 Lapua Magnum at its maximum permissible overall length. The German G22 - AI AWM (.300 Winchester Magnum) and G24 - AI AW50 (.50 BMG) are however rifles that share the Arctic Warfare system. If you look at the Accuracy International Arctic Warfare and Accuracy International AW50 articles you can find more information on the many rifle variants Accuracy International offers and the .50 BMG chambered variant Germany uses. The variants are separately described in Wikipedia articles and you just happened to find the article on the AW(S)M variant, that is intended for cartridges up to .338 Lapua Magnum.
Francis Flinch (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

L115A3 used in record-distance kill

[edit]

Worth adding? 86.7.211.128 (talk) 00:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added, it's hilarious how some US-based editors tried to imply the double kills were not confirmed ;-) Twobells (talk) 15:42, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AW "Super" Magnum

[edit]

AWSM isn't correct name!! .338 Lapua Magnum ver. is AW Magnum, not Super Magnum! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.206.62.88 (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.338 Lapua Magnum

[edit]

I am re-writing the section because Lapua specifically designed a .338 for the L115A3 which the British load to a high pressure and there isn't a 'problem' as such otherwise hundred of long arms could be described as having 'problems' due to ammunition being specifically designed for their purpose. Twobells (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merging suggestion proposed since August 2012

[edit]

Created discussion section after above merging proposal by user ‎71.181.32.89.

Opposed - The various Accuracy International models and their variants often have separate Wikipedia articles, see {{Accuracy International}}.--Francis Flinch (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See longer, but inconclusive discussion at Talk:Accuracy International Arctic Warfare#Merging suggestion proposed since August 2012. Rezin (talk) 22:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 21:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arctic Warfare AWM → Accuracy International AWM – The article was previously moved to Arctic Warfare Sniper Rifle without any proper explanation or discussion see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare#Merging_suggestion_proposed_since_August_2012 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Accuracy_International_Arctic_Warfare#Merging Reverting the name to Accuracy International AWM will also restore the AIetc template. --Francis Flinch (talk) 17:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

  • Support. --Francis Flinch - The reasoning of the move to Arctic Warfare Sniper Rifle cannot be correct. This article extensively deals with 2 Magnum chamberings (the .300 Winchester Magnum and the .338 Lapua Magnum chambering) and not only with the .300 Winchester Magnum chambering. I do however assume good faith, since the AWSM designation is sometimes unofficially used instead of the official manufacturers AWM designation to denote the .338 Lapua Magnum chambering. Further the various Accuracy International models and their variants often have separate Wikipedia articles starting with Accuracy International before their model designation , see {{AIetc}}. --Francis Flinch (talk) 10:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. --Twobells agreed, rationale as above.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Inconsistency of information : Expert needed

[edit]

Different sources give different info on this rifle. It is unclear what the base platform is and what the derived variants are. One example is the Singapore sub-section of the section operators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RKKarnad (talk • contribs) 12:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Singapore sub-section of the section operators is somewhat problematic since it lacks a reference of official use of Accuracy International rifles by Singapore. What is unclear in the The Accuracy International AWM rifle is a variant of the British Accuracy International Arctic Warfare (AW). Compared to the AW, the AWM has a longer bolt to accommodate larger magnum-length cartridges such as the .300 Winchester Magnum and the .338 Lapua Magnum. The bolt head, locking ring, and extractor were also revised to work with the increased size and operating pressures of magnum rifle cartridges. text provided you follow the internal link to Accuracy International Arctic Warfare and read that article? I will try to mention the AW was the base platform for the AWM--Francis Flinch (talk) 13:35, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added Official image from rights holder

[edit]

We've been lucky, AI have kindly supplied all official and up to date images for the articles on Wikipedia. Twobells (talk) 18:44, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Accuracy International AWM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Accuracy International AWM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

have dropped 120.95 m (396.8 ft)

[edit]

"have dropped 120.95 m (396.8 ft) or in angular units 48.9 milliradian (168 MOA) on their way" Is it recorded what his rifle was sited at before this encounter? 1000m? as each click would be 2.5ft at that range.--Simon19801 (talk) 11:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Accuracy International AWM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accuracy International AWM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Accuracy_International_AWM&oldid=1212524227"