Talk:Accropode

Comments

This page is NOT an advert. It gives factual information. This information is quite positive as this product is indeed N°1 in this industry. This is confirmed by many references given in the page.Artreve (talk) 08:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - this page should be kept, it's very informative. I found it very helpful when doing some background research on a construction project I was about to do some work on, it would be a shame for it to be removed. Girth Summit (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you could take out the capitals from ACCROPODE TRADE-MARK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.116.16.173 (talk) 02:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken out all the cringe-inducing CAPITALS and bolding, which made this article look like a tabloid newspaper, and those TRADE-MARK^TM symbols, but this still reads horribly like an ad. It's a pity because this is a notable subject which deserves a properly written article. Please don't restore the trademark symbols. Trademarks are protected by the general disclaimer which is linked to from every Wikipedia page. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up this article. I will think about rewritting instead of a listing features but do me a favour by removing the "ad" tag. Artreve (talk) 12:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, its not the worst ad-page, but it could still look more encyclopedic, I wouldn't remove the tag yet. A bit more info showing why this commercial product deserves a place here would be good. If you maintain that it is the number one, then show us why.

Are there any criticisms? Is there any more history to this?

149.241.132.127 (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accropode. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071108230942/http://www.kennisbank-waterbouw.nl/rockmanual/ to http://www.kennisbank-waterbouw.nl/rockmanual

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]