Talk:Accrington F.C.

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Accrington Stanley

Don't think all the stuff about Stanley's recent success should be included here - it's already on the Stanley page and they are not the same club as the one this page is about............. ChrisTheDude 23:21, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Experiment

Agree with above, it seems to have been removed. I've tidied up the journalese a bit and removed the singular/plural confusion.

As an experiment, I've included early on a summary of performance in the Football League. While this could be obtained by analysing the information on the page, that isn't true of all League clubs, including such luminaries as Man U. I propose to do this eventually for all past and present league clubs (I started with Accrington as the first League club to leave the League) subject to securing the data, and to add FA Cup performance similarly. I feel this is what is most useful to readers other than enthusiasts who want the blow-by-blow account given in the detailed sections. Comments welcomed. Chrismorey (talk) 01:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accrington F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007214517/http://accringtoncc.tuxsports.com/history/early_days.html to http://accringtoncc.tuxsports.com/history/early_days.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]