Talk:Academic drama
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Academic drama received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Jcbjaw12 (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment. Further details were available on the "Education Program:CUNY, Brooklyn College/THEA 7212X Theater History to 1642 (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Jcbjaw12 (talk) 14:56, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Hi Jessie,
First, I really liked this article and this it looks great!
Structure, Format, and Appearance: Overall, the lead section is detailed (maybe too detailed, you could even have a section describing the genre), straightforward, and clear. As well, the article has a well structured body with headings the organize the contents. I do think you could add a section on the significance of academic drama so that we know its historical importance, what it effected, and why it matters. Your article has plenty of useful links in the text and a great reference section. I think a great place to add links might be in the list of plays and playwrights. I could imagine a reader wanting to be able to click to learn more about a particular piece.
Content and Sources: The information is very clear, relevant, accurate, and comprehensive. As I mentioned before, there could be a bit more history/historical development in terms of what led scholars to create academic drama and what was gained after they did. I really appreciated the way you backed up your statements with stories that showed how you got there.
Overall: I think this article is looking really good and much improved. I think readers will find this page very useful! Hopefully my comments help a little. Great Job!