Talk:Absorption-compression heat pump

Review

@Jaqen I am ready for a first review of the article. Thomas Dalberto (talk) 12:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We prefer not to show "naked urls": in the External links section you should use Template:Cite web. You don't have to use all the fields of course, but you should use the "title" one so the url is not shown
You could increase the size of the diagrams by using "upright" so it is easier to read them, see MOS:IMGSIZE

Jaqen (talk) 13:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, should be corrected now Thomas Dalberto (talk) 13:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I liked it very much! The content was clear and gave a good introduction of technology and its development through history.

I corrected some spelling mistakes and some sentences that weren't clear. Alexandrinovic (talk) 12:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate your review Thomas Dalberto (talk) 14:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Excellent work!

The article includes a complete review of the system and the history of the development. It also covers different configurations and the selection of suitable refrigerants and absorbents for these systems which is critical. Hamidreza Heydari1998 (talk) 13:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate your review Thomas Dalberto (talk) 14:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

The article is clear and well written. I just corrected some minor mistakes. You may check the availability of Wikipedia pages related to the researchers you quoted in the History paragraph. SergioCarlosMiguel (talk) 13:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review, I appreciate. Thank you also for your suggestion, unfortunately I checked but I was not able to find them... Thomas Dalberto (talk) 14:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Observations and suggestions for improvements

The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2024.

A few suggestions to improve the present article: 1) provide more details concerning the energy performance figures of the ACHP, in comparison with AHP and CHP; 2) review the literature references, avoiding repetitions and focusing more on scientific journal papers; in addition, some references are not accurate, namely they do not point to the original document but to one mentioning it, 3) check the date for Osenbruck's patent, 4) check typos and grammar

--Aandurro (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]