Talk:Aberdour School

Merge tag

No reason has been given for the proposed merge. This article already has two notable alumni and I see no reason for a merge. Dahliarose (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OpposeI must say the way this and a whole load of other Merge tags that seem to have been added to prep school articles without any attempt at justification strikes me as agenda pushing by a single editor. lack of references is most certainly not a reason for merger; lack of notability of course is, however such a lack has not been proven and indeed no attempt has been made to do so in almost all cases. 86.2.164.57 (talk) 08:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All these tags were added back to the articles in a very short space of time and no attempt seems to have been made to check to see what sources are available. Dahliarose (talk) 11:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge per Dahliarose. I see no proper challenge to this school's notability. Moonraker (talk) 17:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. It was the work of a very few minutes to find WP:RS citations for this school's notability. The article must stand as a separate article. Merge tagging this and other prep schools has all the appearance of WP:POINT and is destructive to WIkipedia Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aberdour School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811051452/http://www.aberdourschool.co.uk:80/default.aspx to http://www.aberdourschool.co.uk/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aberdour School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.attainmagazine.co.uk/news/story/277/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.blunt4reigate.com/newsshow.aspx?id=65&ref=208
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120422030946/http://www.anthonymillard.co.uk/amc-news/interview-independent-school-head-of-the-year-2011 to http://www.anthonymillard.co.uk/amc-news/interview-independent-school-head-of-the-year-2011

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]