Jump to content

Talk:Aberdeen Proving Ground

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Google Maps shows that there are four airfields (or former airfields) within Aberdeen Proving Grounds. If there are separate articles about these, I couldn't find them. I was tempted to place this article within Category:Airports in Maryland, but there is currently no mention in this article about any airport facilities. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of airports in Maryland links to Phillips Army Airfield, but it is a redirect to this article (which doesn't mention airfields). Weide Army Airfield is a redlink. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of requested move

[edit]

It has been proposed to move Aberdeen to Aberdeen, Scotland or Aberdeen city, and to move Aberdeen (disambiguation) to Aberdeen. The discussion about this is here. --Una Smith (talk) 16:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controveries?

[edit]

"Controversies

I don't have time or knowledge to put these things here, but I wanted to leave this for someone to peruse. http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/02/15/bz.study.pdf and http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/02/15/human.test.subjects.-.edgewood.ketchum.lsd.study.pdf Those are two unclassified documents talking about how human test subjects were used to test chemical weapons in the 60s. I feel like this is something that should be known and this is a reputable source coming from the people who did it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.68.112.171 (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Under the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program announced in 2005, APG is projected to lose the Ordnance School and associated R&D facilities with 3862 military and 290 civilian jobs moving to Fort Lee, Virginia. APG will gain 451 military and 5,661 civilian jobs from Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. There is a net loss of 3,411 military jobs under BRAC and a net gain of 5,371 civilian jobs."

How is this a controversy? it's a done deal and the move planning is well underway. It is important information about the Ordnance School but I don't see how it is a controversy. DMorpheus (talk) 17:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While BRAC decisions were (and continue to be considered) controversial, I take DMorpheus's point that in the context of this article on APG, there is no controversy. How it affects APG is of note, of course, so the information (with NPOV) should remain in the article. I've edited the layout accordingly. - Thaimoss (talk) 14:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There has been an ongoing controversy about the 2005 BRAC and the move from Monmouth to APG, though it's just not reflected in this article. There's a section under Fort Monmouth that explains it, at the bottom: Fort_Monmouth#Closure_by_BRAC. Rurik (talk) 14:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Secure area and Tank Mile

[edit]

The secure area is mentioned in passing, but deserves more discussion as this is where the base actually functions. There's no mention at all of the Tank Mile? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TreacherousWays (talk • contribs) 21:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Public Domain Source for Human Experimentation

[edit]

Edgewood Arsenal Chemical Agent Exposure Studies 1955-1975Johnvr4 (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aberdeen Proving Ground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aberdeen Proving Ground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semipalatinsk Test Site (STS)

[edit]

How does it relate? It is not mentioned in the article. Kr 17387349L8764 (talk) 11:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Aberdeen_Proving_Ground&oldid=1246011463"