Talk:Aber and Inver (placename elements)

Celts Low‑importance

	Aber and Inver (placename elements) is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spanish

I have moved this paragraph here from the article.

Abra is Spanish for a not wide bay, but the Dictionary of Royal Spanish Academy derives it from French havre, a cognate for "haven". It names the Abra bay on the Bilbao Estuary.

The fact that Abra looks vaguely like Aber is no reason for inclusion here. Do you have a reference to a scholar who disagrees with the Spanish Academy and sees them as connected? Despite the fact that there was once such a thing as Celtiberian, I would be very surprised to find Celtic forms in Spanish. --Doric Loon 12:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote this, gaelic in ireland is at least a thousand years older than gaelic in scotland, even sticking to the origin myth of gaelic travelling from ireland to scotland this would still only count in the hundreds and at that only a few, gaelic is attested to in scotland from at least the 4th century and in ireland not much further back than the turn of the millenium. More likely argyll and ireland were originally gaelic speaking at roughly the same time, with the more mountainous terrain of scotland forming a natural linguistic barrier between p and q celtic languages east and west. Some archaelogical evidence to back up spurious statistics would be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.107.156.171 (talk) 02:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Aber-' in England (?)

- it would be interesting to have precise examples to back up the claim of instances of 'aber' in 'parts of England' (outside Cornwall). One or two in Devon, perhaps? Where else? Ceartas 18:53, 29

September 2010 (UTC)

devon held on to its british language longer than the counties to the east of it, but obviously not as long as Cornwall. i notice that two of the listed Welsh uses of Aber as a prefix are tagged 'disambiguation required'. why? they are just examples of the use of the prefix. Daiyounger (talk) 21:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aber and Inver (placename elements). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070619050742/http://www.gaelg.iofm.net/DICTIONARY/dict2/I.html to http://www.gaelg.iofm.net/DICTIONARY/dict2/I.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]