Talk:Aasen mortar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aasen mortar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War I task force

Soviet Union: Military Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aasen mortar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Weapons by country

Hi, User:Andy Dingley.[1] Weapons are categorized by country of development, not of production or use. See the description in the top category Category:Weapons by country. Notice, for example, the T-54/55 is only categorized as a tank of the Soviet Union, not of Czechoslovakia and Poland that also manufactured it, nor of the many T-54/T-55 operators that used it. —Michael Z. 13:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are admittedly inconsistent on this, see for instance, Smith & Wesson Model 10 & Thompson submachine gun as UK infantry weapons, both US made.

But my point here is that the Aasen might have been a Norwegian invention (in France), but they were developed in Russia and produced in Russia, for use by Russia, their only user.

A similar point could be made for the first Vickers Maxim guns (which make it into Category:Weapons of the Ottoman Empire, along with many others!). Vickers became involved with Maxim firstly to set up a factory in Russia to produce Maxims chambered for the Mosin–Nagant round. This involved a major redesign of the Maxim, to produce what became the 'Vickers gun' when it was re-introduced to the UK by Vickers, then built in such numbers for WWI. (Listed under Category:World War I infantry weapons of the United States and Category:Weapons of the Philippine Army.) It also led to the PM M1910. The Vickers-Maxim (which we don't have an article on) and the PM M1910 would surely be Russian, even by the tightest of your definitions? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]