Talk:Aarakshan

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Does Taran Adarsh really deserve a space on wikipedia?

I have never ever found one review by Taran Adarsh which is really unbiased and is written keeping the journalism conscious alive. Had it been only my perception, I would not have wasted the time of others by making them read all this, however, am saying so as almost all the times complete media fraternity (including the masses at large) feels the other way but Adarsh has a different take. Isn't this a straightaway abuse of position? Ever heard of content marketing, eh? Fanofbollywood (talk) 09:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1000% agree...and not only taran aadarsh there are many whose review always look as biased and part of PR campaign of movie..But what choice we have.Unlike US we don't have Rotten tomatoes or MetaCritic active.--abhishek (talk) 06:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't we do anything about it? Drop Taran Adarsh and it is solved, we can always derive a consensus. There was not even a single critic who rated it past 2.5-3 but Taran justifies 4-4.5 also, rather that is the reason from where people get the guts to write "positive to mixed", there was no mixed as far as Aarakshan was concerned it was a clear thumbs down.

Disclaimer: I do not have anything against the movie, but the way articles here are being drafted these days. Fanofbollywood (talk) 07:45, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks biased agains the movie

The critical accalim section of this article included only those critic reviews who gave Aarakshan thumbs down, while large number of critic reviews and most of the reviews from Hollywood have given Aarakshan a thumbs up and must recommendation. This article seems to be written with prejudice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.99.166.60 (talk) 05:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am disappointed that you didn't sign the post, anyway, you see the beauty of wikipedia lies in the fact that anyone (including you) can edit any article as long as you have proper citations to back-up your claims. If you think that way, then I encourage you to edit the article supporting it with "Hollywood" references.Fanofbollywood (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Aarakshan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aarakshan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]