Talk:A series and B series

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Philosophy of science

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neologisms

As a quick note, I would like to point out that the terms "tensional" and "non-tensional" are confusing and possible neologisms. I'm not sure if McTaggart uses these terms in his writing, but I cannot seem to find their widespread use online. A simple search of Google and Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy will demonstrate this. The terms "tensed" and "tenseless" are not only less cumbersome and problematic (as tensional reminds one of 'tension' rather than 'tense'), they are used in a popular book on Philosophy of Space & Time. "Time and Space" by Barry Dainton; ISBN 0-7735-2306-5

I am not done researching the matter, but if someone who has read McTaggart wants to comment on the usage, please feel free to do so. Or change it all together, if in fact McTaggart does not use the terms "tensional" and "non-tensional."

Otherwise I will revise this once I have sufficient knowledge. 98.185.216.53 (talk) 03:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

exalting the label over the substance

A-series and B-series are terms introduced by the Scottish idealist philosopher John McTaggart in 1908 which have become classic terms of reference in modern discussions of the philosophy of time, even outside the analytic tradition.

Call me crazy but I'd prefer that the first sentence say what the series are rather than how important their names are. —Tamfang (talk) 06:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I tried to rectify that but it could probably use even more tinkering; have at it! BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 23:40, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Ideally A-series and B-series should have their own dedicated sections of the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.106.18.48 (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

The verb tenses in this article are grammatically incorrect. All sentences about the past must use past tensed verbs, and all sentences about the future must use future tensed verbs. Sentences like "future objects exist" should be changed to "future objects will exist". Similarly, sentences like "past objects exist" should be changed to "past objects existed". Any sentence about the past or future which uses the present tense is necessarily false, regardless of the rest of the sentence content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.203.90.130 (talk) 21:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A-series and B-series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051125154105/http://www.trinity.edu:80/cbrown/time/mctaggart.html to http://www.trinity.edu/cbrown/time/mctaggart.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with "B-theory of time"

This article should be absorbed into the present article called "B-theory of time" and the resulting article should be renamed "A-series and B-series of Time" ---Dagme (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vague series descriptions

I believe this article would be much improved with diagrammatic representations of the A and B series relations.