Talk:A Young Man's World

A Young Man's World
A Young Man's World
	Front DVD cover of A Young Man's World
Directed by	Kevin Clarke
Written by	Kevin Clarke
Produced by	Barry Knight; Russell Moore
Starring	Joe Landon; Ashton Ryan
Cinematography	Barry Knight; Russell Moore
Production; company	Delta Production
Distributed by	Paladin Video
Release date	2000;
Running time	120 minutes
Country	United States
Language	English

A fact from A Young Man's World appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2012, and was viewed approximately 3,865 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a review for the 2000 gay pornographic video A Young Man's World said its portrayal of fictional middle-aged men was demeaning to actual middle-aged men?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Young Man's World.

Wikipedia

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors on 15th November 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on A Young Man's World. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.grabbys.com/a1.grab.00.cat.win.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.grabbys.com/a1.grab.00.win.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Young Man's World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

@Meters: I added the infobox when I created this article. Right now, I have second thoughts about the infobox. Honestly, I am uncertain or unconfident that it is effectively increasing readers' understandings of the topic itself, the... well, you get the idea. I figure that the readers will read either just the lead section or the whole article and already understand what the article is about already. Also, having a lesser-known names in the infobox... well... The "Cast" section is substantial enough, and only one actor's name is linked. Also, the lead section already mentions the names of the production company and distributor and the running time. I thought about re-removing it after you reverted my attempted removal months ago. I wonder whether a consensus is necessary. What do you think? --George Ho (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reason to remove it. It's a useful summary of the basic info, just as all info boxes are. Rather than reading the entire article looking for information that may or may not be in the prose it's easier to just look at an infobox summary. Meters (talk) 20:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After long thought, if the infobox makes readers of this article happy, then... I'll leave the infobox alone and drop the matter for now. Of course, someone else would disagree and say otherwise, but... I'll still leave it alone just for readers. Nevertheless, best not to treat it as precedent to other related articles. --George Ho (talk) 19:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that I've ever heard of removing an infobox from an article, unless maybe the info contained in it was completely bogus. Guy1890 (talk) 07:20, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added the infobox here for display, Guy1890. --George Ho (talk) 07:45, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are some individual articles where people have tried to argue that for some special reason unique to that particular topic, an infobox was somehow uniquely not useful there for reasons different than its usefulness on other comparable topics (see e.g. Talk:Stanley Kubrick). So no, "infobox not needed" certainly isn't a common argument, but it's not an unprecedented one either. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]