Talk:A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Untitled

This page reads like a publisher's blurb, not an encyclopedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.27.86.13 (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this book falls well above the median Wikipedia book stub in notability. I've seen it quoted by a variety of academic literatures, from critical theory to economics, and have often found it to be a good bridge to the ideas of Deleuze and Braudel in my own (non-academic, for-profit policy think-tank) work in post-2008 analysis. Now, I know my word doesn't make something true, so I'd like to help making it meet the Wikipedia notability guidelines. I'll be following this talk page for advice. --Dnavarro (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]