Talk:A No No/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 21:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
GA review
[edit]I believe this was nominated in good faith, however, there are some major concerns regarding said article. One of them being a song just released a month ago, in a couple of months from now if the song keeps charting it will be more discussed and appear in other articles with reviews and such. Moreover, there should be a section detailing the release history and other with FULL Credits and personnel, not just writers and producers but engineers, mixing, mastering, studios and such. There are several sources on the talk page of this article and I can see they were used, so they can now be removed and next time add them on the top of the talk page using the refideas template.
Regarding the criteria. "A No No" it is not broad in its coverage as its section has five sentences at the best, there is one topic dedicated to the remix when it has yet had barely any impact it could be merged into other sections. This was a premature GA nomination and its in no order to become one yet, perhaps later down the road. On top of this, I have serious doubts regarding its stability as it can change significantly from day to day with new charts, articles being added and so on. I can't do anything but fail this article. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- I highly disagree. It's definitely broad in its coverage, and anyone who follows the music industry knows that Mariah isn't going to have a commercially successful song in 2019. All in all, I don't think anything is going to change which would make this unstable anytime soon. Meets the GA criteria in my opinion and I will definitely re-nominate it soon.--NØ 16:24, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- It's not, I have seen other articles you created away more broad in their coverage. How can you or anyone say its broad in its coverage with 5 sentences in each section or less. Sure not every section will have more than five sentences, but every single one of them?? Doesn't matter if it is successful or not that's not the point, I never said it had to be successful in the first place I just said it could enter more charts. Sure go ahead, I doubt it will pass. Not everything is meant to be GA. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC)