Talk:A Certain Magical Index/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
I'll review this article.Tintor2 (talk) 16:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- The article looks pretty good but there is some stuff that I think needs to be revised.
- Lead
- Can the ability of Toma be explored? Why is it so weird in the setting?
- Done
- Based on the infobox, the light novels already ended so the final date could be added. If a sequel is still being published then it's also worth writing there.
- Added
- Infobox
- Since there are way too many forms of sequels and adaptations I suggest using the "collapsed infobox section begin" like in Code Geass or Darker than Blood to avoid conflict between the infobox and prose.
- Collapsed
Plot is easy understand- Development
- I don't think the release subsection is needed based on the length.
- I removed the subheading, although I do feel the information in it is worth stating in the article.
- Video games
- Arcade is too small. Think of the formal writing of an article like a formal letter when each paragraph is well balanced.
- Combined with another section.
- Critical reception
- Same as other sections. There is no need to make so many subsection with that content.
- Same as above
@Link20XX: Other than that, the article is easy to understand. Revise this and I'll gladly pass it.Tintor2 (talk) 18:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: See above. Link20XX (talk) 21:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Nice work. The article now feels easier to read especially with the infobox focusing on the first work.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)