Talk:A8 (Croatia)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 10:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

I shall review. ⇒TAP 10:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Lead

• Generally fine, but replace "(39.8 mi) road in Croatia. It connects" with "(39.8 mi) motorway in Croatia. It connects"

• I reworded the sentence, but I'm not clear on the wikilink here. Motorways in Croatia currently links to the same section as Highways in Croatia#Motorways is use of the redirect problematic or is the latter solution simply preferable?--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• My error. Simply, change "road" to "motorway", I think. ⇒TAP 11:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• Changed.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to strike when done.

• Include information about being a toll road

• Actually, the last paragraph of the lead deals with this issue already. Is there something missing?--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• I did a minor edit. Grand now. ⇒TAP 11:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• Uh, yes, that was missing. Thanks.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• Nothing major. :) ⇒TAP 11:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Route description

• "is an east–west motorway" — clarify in more detail, both opposite directions.

• Added information on which cities (Rijeka and Rovinj - well, their general area) it connects and what other routes it links (A7 and A9).--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Tolls

• Include some of this in lead.

• I'm striking this out because it is dealt with already in the "Lead" part of the review.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• Please explain a 'ticket system'.

• I added a very brief explanation of the system - I felt reluctant to proceed at a greater detail because the term is wikilinked in the same sentence. Do you feel more is needed here?--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• Grand. ⇒TAP 11:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

History

• Italicise 'shape' in 'Y shape'.

• Done.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Future

• Grand

Traffic volume

• Fine

Service areas

• Good.

I will put this On Hold for now. ⇒TAP 10:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for taking time and effort to review this article. I believe your comments helped improve its overall quality.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Passed. ⇒TAP 12:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)