Jump to content

Talk:7th Infantry Division (United States)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article7th Infantry Division (United States) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 5, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 22, 2009WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 12, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
July 15, 2009Good topic candidateNot promoted
August 3, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 12, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Valencia on Leyte

[edit]

Disambiguating: The section Leyte and Okinawa names Valencia on the road to toward Ormoc. Could someone verify that this is a fourth place 'Valencia' in Philippines, not being

Thanx, -DePiep (talk) 08:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. None of those towns are on Leyte. -Ed!(talk) 16:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okinawa landings

[edit]

The article states that the 7th and 96th divisions landed along with the 2nd and 6th Marine divisions. It is my understanding that the 2nd Marine division was in reserve and it was the 1st Marine division which made the landing.

The four divisions together made the landing, though no, they did not all land there at the same time. —Ed!(talk) 01:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, four divisions landed together, the 7th, 96th, 1st Marine, and 6th Marine; the 2nd Marine Division was not one of them. That was the issue.209.244.31.35 (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see. It looks like you're right, I changed the article to clarify and correct for this. —Ed!(talk) 00:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated.209.244.31.35 (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Campaign Credit

[edit]

Just a note that the official lineage and honors as credited by the US Army Center of Military History includes credit for participation in Just Cause in Panama, which would bring the total number of campaign streamers to 16. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.139.83.69 (talk) 12:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 7th Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 7th Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal and replacement of incomplete Rottman source

[edit]

Over the last few days there have been a number of back-and-forth reverts, unusual on a relatively uncontroversial page like this, on the section on the late 1980s order of battle. This is at it's heart because the source cited was Gordon L. Rottmen, Inside the US Army Today, Osprey Publishing 1988 (sic: Rottman). Yet the data supposed to be supported by that showed detailed assignment of maneuver battalions to individual maneuver brigades. Rottman at page 31 gives a list of maneuver battalions, but does not actually say which of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Brigades they belong to. Now, after I disgracefully lost my temper several times - anyone interested can read the main WT:MILHIST talk page - Noclador, the user who was claiming Rottman gave this more detailed information which the book actually didn't, has written on the main Milhist talkpage that the actual source was a combination of U.S. Army Regulation 600-82 which has to be read in conjunction with a couple of works on the United States invasion of Panama so that those Panama sources give which battalions are assigned to which brigades. Yet I have rolled him back again. Why? Noclador has cited entire works or chapter-sized pieces: AR600-82 is 33 pages long. Wikipedia is written for generalists, rather than specialists, who may know the material better and be more easily able to identify where in any source the individual piece of data came from. This is part of the reason WP:PAGENUM specifically says "Specify the page number or range of page numbers". I will continue rolling this addition of data back until page numbers are cited. Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 23:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:7th_Infantry_Division_(United_States)&oldid=1214178384"