Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/7th Infantry Division (United States)

7th Infantry Division (United States)

Article is a GA, looking to get it to FA. Please pay special attention to referencing and sources, they seem to be the biggest obstacle. -Ed!^(talk) 21:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per User:Abraham, B.S., I would like to request to close this peer review, since I currently have an A-class review open for this article. I will reopen a new Peer Review when the A class review is complete. -Ed!^(talk) 05:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kirill Lokshin

A few (mostly stylistic) suggestions:

I'd suggest removing the "(inactive)" fields in the infobox entirely; they're pretty repetetive, and just make the infobox bigger without really adding any information.
- Done Ed!^(talk) 04:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The "Active Component/Reserve Component" heading may be better off as "Active and Reserve Component" or something along those lines; the slash is a somewhat peculiar thing to have in a section name.
- "Active Component/Reserve Component" is a proper noun to describe the status of the unit according to the Army. If its a terrible issue I can rename the header but it shouldn't be altered. -Ed!^(talk) 04:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a reason why the unit citation table is in reverse chronological order while the campaign streamer citation is in chronological order? I would suggest, in any case, removing the two sub-headings and just having the two tables in a single section.
- Reordered the first box of awards. -Ed!^(talk) 04:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The component template at the bottom might be better nested immediately after the infobox, with "style=wide" removed.
- Done Ed!^(talk) 04:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work! Kirill ^[talk] [pf] 00:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]