Talk:69th Golden Globe Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

There seems to be a mistake in the TV section.

It says:

Best Performance in a Television Series – Musical or Comedy Actress Laura Linney – The Big C as Cathy Jamison Toni Collette – United States of Tara as Tara Gregson Edie Falco – Nurse Jackie as Jackie Peyton Tina Fey – 30 Rock as Liz Lemon Lea Michele – Glee as Rachel Berry

but on the Golden Globes website (see here: http://www.goldenglobes.org/blog/2011/12/the-69th-annual-golden-globe-awards-nominations/ ) it says "19. BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A TELEVISION SERIES – COMEDY OR MUSICAL a. LAURA DERN ENLIGHTENED b. ZOOEY DESCHANEL NEW GIRL c. TINA FEY 30 ROCK d. LAURA LINNEY THE BIG C e. AMY POEHLER PARKS AND RECREATION"

Now if I am not mistaken that clearly says "Best Performance by an Actress in a Television Series Comedy or Musical", yet on this page it has the award, but some of the people have been incorrectly put in. So I am going to edit this correctly. --Charlr6 (talk) 15:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Counts

Why is Clooney listed as 4 noms and Payne listed as 3? When I do a find on Clooney I only see 3 and a find on Payne only yields 2.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clooney also holds a producer credit for "The Ides of March", while Payne holds one for "The Descendants". The producer(s) receives the award in the event of a Best Picture win at any award ceremony. --99.101.160.159 (talk) 02:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy?

some people are puzzled as to why Ryan Gosling was nominated for Best Leading Actor in a Comedy for "Crazy Stupid Love", when Steve Carell was the main character. --99.101.160.159 (talk) 02:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Script leak?

The "leaked script" seems highly suspect with inconsistencies regarding facts mentioned in the monologue (Hugh Hefner's wife? He's not married) and introductions of presenters not expected to appear. The "source" is a single Facebook page with no mention of the supposed leak by media, mainstream or otherwise. Deletion of this section is suggested. 72.240.145.1 (talk) 17:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting some of the sections

Should we delete the "Schedule" section now since the ceremony has passed, as it lengthens the page? And speaking of, is the Presenters section REALLY necessary??? — WylieCoyote (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted the Schedule section today. — WylieCoyote (talk) 14:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 69th Golden Globe Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150801165849/http://www.goldenglobes.org/ to http://www.goldenglobes.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

X 217c5312.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]