Talk:55 Broad Street
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from 55 Broad Street appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 02:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that 55 Broad Street, a skyscraper in the Financial District of Manhattan, was called "an unlovable building in an unlivable neighborhood"?
- ALT1: ... that 55 Broad Street, a skyscraper in the Financial District of Manhattan, is being converted into an all-electric residential building, eschewing gas heating? Source: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/06/can-turning-office-towers-into-apartments-save-downtowns
- ALT2: ... that 55 Broad Street, a skyscraper in the Financial District of Manhattan, is undergoing a conversion from commercial office space into residential apartments? Source: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/06/can-turning-office-towers-into-apartments-save-downtowns
- ALT3: ... that 55 Broad Street, a skyscraper in the Financial District of Manhattan, had its architectural style called "a stack of boxes"? Source: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/06/can-turning-office-towers-into-apartments-save-downtowns
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing
- Comment: ALT0 & ALT3 are slightly spicy "reviews", but should be fine & "hook"-y. ALT1 & ALT2 are less interesting, but also less controversial, backups.
SnowFire (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC).
- Article clears criteria. New enough, long enough, it's well-sourced and presentable. Earwig tool shows low copyvio %. Hooks are all cited (I prefer ALT0 — it's so sad :-( but I do find it interesting for the DYK section). And QPQ is complete. Good job on this one for sure. Soulbust (talk) 01:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)