Jump to content

Talk:53W53

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Delayed indefinitely

[edit]

Special:Contributions/96.246.161.64 keeps reverting the December 2008 New York Times article saying the building is on indefinite hold. The article says:

Now that high-end bubble has popped, and it is unlikely to return anytime soon. Jean Nouvel’s 75-story residential tower adjoining the Museum of Modern Art has been delayed indefinitely. And developers now seem loath to undertake similar projects. Even if the economy turns around, the public’s tolerance for outsize architectural statements that serve the rich and self-absorbed has already been pretty much exhausted.

If you have a newer reference saying it is on track please post with a reference. Americasroof (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This one is in site prep at the time of this post. Spurdos (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://observer.com/2012/11/not-verre-yet-hines-still-looking-for-financing-for-moma-tower/ --Craigboy (talk) 07:17, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 53W53. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 53W53. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk05:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

53 West 53
53 West 53
  • Reviewed: Yeren
  • Comment: I can suggest more hooks as necessary.

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 18:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: This looks like a solid candidate to me. I have a slight preference for the ALT3 blurb, though the original and ALT1 are also pretty interesting, IMO. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 16:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:53W53/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sauna or steam room?

[edit]

Does the fitness center have a sauna or steam room? Betathetapi454 (talk) 08:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]