Talk:4 bore
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 4 bore article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
"1/4 lb—that is, 0.25 lb"
[edit]The article explains that 1/4 ist 0.25. - Wow. That's maths for dummies. - What's your target reader group if they need this explained? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.219.96.104 (talk) 14:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 4 bore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204021131/http://john-ross.net:80/faq.php to http://www.john-ross.net/faq.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Fictional use
[edit]The use of four bore elephant guns in fiction, such as in Allan Quatermain, the sequel to King Solomon's Mines, was a common theme during the Golden Age of African hunting and in Lost World type adventure stories published in the late 19th Century and early 20th Century. The four bore also figures prominently in more recent fiction, such as Unintended Consequences.[1]
Popular culture sections are discouraged by a number of essays, including WP:In popular culture. Since this material doens't have any secondary sources, the appearance of 4 bore weapons in these novels does not seem important. Felsic2 (talk) 17:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". John-Ross.net. Archived from the original on 2014-12-04.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 4 bore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160125051427/http://www.riflemagazine.com/magazine/article.cfm?magid=44&tocid=553. to http://www.riflemagazine.com/magazine/article.cfm?magid=44&tocid=553.
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Magnum Performance
[edit]I question the "magnum" performance specs cited for the 4-bore. This was a blackpowder weapon, originally a muzzleloader and later a cartridge breechloader, still blackpowder. Its migration to nitro propellant loading did not include a corresponding increase in muzzle velocity, as occurred with many other blackpowder expresses. I have never seen mention of a so-called "magnum" level of performance for a 4-bore, which is generally regarded as the very epitome of excessive power (or recoil, at any rate) to begin with. There would have been no appetite for such a beast as is suggested by these figures (2600 fps). For comparison, the 700 Nitro Express, which is very nearly the most powerful rifle ever created, and something of a custom made gimmick rather than a real production entity, is appreciably less potent than these figures, driving a mere 1000 grain bullet at 2000 fps. Ulfhere (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)