Jump to content

Talk:SAP S/4HANA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:4HANA)

Requested move 19 November 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved by SwisterTwister. Jenks24 (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



4HANASAP S/4HANA – article about SAP S/4HANA recently went live but with an incorrect title of "4HANA". So the “S/” is missing from the title, the "S/" is important because it signifies that it is a “suite” of software. Somewhere along the editing, someone removed the "S/". The page should be called "SAP S/4HANA" (you will see the rest of the article refers to it as SAP S/4HANA too), I would like to request a page move in order to correct this title. Thanks! Olivia0452 (talk) 17:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that we instead move it ot the "full" name of "SAP Business Suite 4 SAP HANA" which avoids the issues with a name containing a slash, and is less cryptic as well. Olivia0452, would you object to this? If not, I will do the move. DES (talk) 23:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DESiegel: What if we try to cover all bases and do the following as the title: SAP Business Suite 4 SAP HANA (SAP S/4HANA) . Would that work too? Olivia0452 (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Olivia0452[reply]

Olivia0452 the whole point of my suggestion is to avoid the presence of a "/" character in the article title, because that causes technical problems, being interpreted by the software to indicate a sub page in the corresponding talk page name. Putting the slashed form in the article itself will allow searches to find it, and a redirect could also be created, as that wouldn't have the talk page issue. DES (talk) 13:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.