Jump to content

Talk:2nd Brigade, 7th Infantry Division (United States)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2nd Brigade, 7th Infantry Division (United States) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 31, 2009Good article nomineeListed
July 15, 2009Good topic candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2nd Brigade, 7th Infantry Division (United States)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  • Again clarify that the brigades were inactive when the division was garrisoning Korea. And maybe you could structure it something like this: "The 2nd Brigade received the lineage of the 13th Infantry Brigade, formerly assigned to the division during World War I."
  • Strictly speaking the 13th and 14th Brigades weren't assigned to the division's HHC, but rather to the division's HQ, which isn't exactly the HHC.
  • You might want to add OB listings for the brigade to show how many troops the brigade controlled at various times. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed all issues. -Ed!(talk) 02:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This sentence needs to be fixed on this and the 3rd Brigade article. By 1994, the garrison closed the Division subsequently relocated to Fort Lewis, Washington. And the other comments that I copied from the 3rd Brigade article: There's some confusion with tenses and stuff regarding the BRAC plan for the division and what actually happened. I think that the 2nd and 3rd Brigades formally deactivated in 1993 at Ft. Ord, while the division deactivated later. Is that correct? If so please clarify that in the article. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How does it look now? -Ed!(talk) 17:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Still like to see OB listings at various times. Also exactly when did the brigade deactivate?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2nd Brigade, 7th Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]