Jump to content

Talk:2nd Battalion, 9th Marines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2nd Battalion, 9th Marines has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 3, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA Nom comments

[edit]

I've dropped by and reviewed the article. Nicely done! Informative, thorough and understandable by a civvy like me. 8-) There are, however, no references in the article. We need to know where the information came from and where we can go for more info. Please at least include a bibliography section, or, better, inline notes. I've marked the article pending to give you time to do this, rather than failing it outright. --CTSWyneken(talk) 16:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Passed

[edit]

Congratulations! This is now a Good Article listing. To improve it on the road to FA, take a look at WP:LEAD. Ideally, the lead should summarize the rest of the article. Also, have someone with a rep for high quality writing work a little on the style. It is readable as is, but they are a bear at FA. --CTSWyneken(talk) 11:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for the revert

[edit]

The reason for the revert is that the compostion of the 2/9's Battailon is essential to the article since the composition of a Marine Corps Battalion differs from that of the Army or of some other country. This article has passed a review by many editors some of which recommended the Battalion composition. As such the article was promoted to a GA Status. There is no need to delete informative information from an artilce. Tony the Marine 15:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All I removed was the explanation of what H&S and infantry companies do, those are self-explanatory (or at least to the extent of the prose I deleted) and not vastly different from the Army; the battalion composition remains. The deleted text is
  • H&S Company (Headquarters & Service Company) was made up of multiple sections that supported the remainder of the battalion with a variety of service support functions.
  • The infantry companies were composed of Marines who fought primarily on foot with small arms in organized military units.
Also, I notice that the Good Article version (linked above) mentioned a weapons company; but it was since removed (not by me). Was there a weapons company in 2/9?--Mmx1 16:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand where you're coming from, however we owe ourselves to the common laymen who does not understand what these units do and thereby, by providing a small explaination the section becomes informative. Tony the Marine 16:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'm all for more explanatory material, but I don't think the removed text does so, above and beyond what the company names already specify. For example, if the weapons company is a part, it would be helpful to explain what "weapons" it provided, and similarly the H&S could do with an explanation of the services it provides. These are definitions specific to the function of Marine units. However, I think it's a fair presumption to make that someone who made it past the intro and is reading the body of this article should know what infantry is; if not, I wikilinked "infantry" in the first sentence in the intro. It is, incidentally, also wikilinked in this section. --Mmx1 16:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps (Pass)

[edit]

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. In spite of the pass, I feel that the article does have problems which should be addressed. In places the prose standard is quite poor and there are also many references without publication detail. More detailed information on the unit's history would also improve the piece. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

9th Marines under 6th Marines command rates a French Fourage —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.87.230.233 (talk) 01:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unit Awards

[edit]

The "unit awards" listed aren't really unit awards. Units are given campaign and service streamers. Only the awards with unit in their name are actually unit awards and worn by unit members as ribbons. It would be more appropriate to display unit awards as streamers that the Battalion attaches to its colors. See 3rd Battalion 3rd Marines

Awards

[edit]

The Joint Meritorious Unit Citation and the Mexican Border medal has not been awarded to 2/9. Instead the Presidential Unit Citation (Army) Yes, it was awarded to 2/9 during the Vietnam War (1969). Hope this could be corrected and updated on this page. I also have the current logo of the Bn so it could be posted on this page. Respectfully, SgtMaj Santiago, 2/9 current Bn SgtMaj. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.79.15.102 (talk • contribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2nd Battalion 9th Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2nd Battalion 9th Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2nd Battalion, 9th Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2nd Battalion, 9th Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2nd Battalion, 9th Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2nd_Battalion,_9th_Marines&oldid=1214178509"