Talk:28th International Eucharistic Congress/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 01:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can take this on... Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sources look reliable and reasonably formatted (would recommend removing ALLCAPS from news article titles)
- Done.
imgs licensed
"Chicago was home to a Catholic population of approximately 880,000" suggest adding the cities overall population for context
- Added.
"t was later reported as their "largest pilgrimage ever to a foreign country"" when is later? Like present day?
- Added year to the text.
" actively planning their events in Chicago." was the planning done in Chicago or were they planning in Germany for what they would do in the city?
- Added text explaining that they were already in Chicago.
"publishing anti-Catholic sentiments," would it be better expressed as something like "publishing content with anti-catholic sentiments"?
- Changed phrasing slightly.
would the sentence beginning "Also during the congress" better fit in the 'course of the event' section?
- I rephrased that sentence slightly to better fit in the "Preparations" section. I could try to find a way to move it to the "Course of the event" section, but I'm struggling to find a way to do so without it feeling slightly off.
"The delegation was received in New York City" received by who?
- Added further information on who received them.
Are there any pictures of the actual event?
- I included an image of the congress in the infobox and there is a Wikimedia Commons category for the congress. I've found several images of the congress online, but am unsure about the specifics regarding the copyright of many of the images.
how does its size compare to other IEC's?

Looking good. Still have spotchecks to conduct. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie891, thanks for starting this review process. I went ahead and made some edits addressing some of the comments you made already, and am working to find some more information for the other comments. Additionally, if there is anything else you find during the review, please feel free to reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

spotchecked a few, it lines up. This meets the GA criteria. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]