Talk:2011 Sundance Film Festival

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film festivals task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Request moves (for all Sundance festival articles)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request as the more common name--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

27th Sundance Film Festival → 2011 Sundance Film Festival — Sundance Institute refers to their festivals as "YEAR Sundance Film Festival" not "nth Sundance Film Festival". While other media sources may refer to it as the "nth" festival, the Institute offically uses the year, as shown on their website.[1][2] The articles were originally named in this format, but were all moved without any consensus (or edit summary reason) several months ago. Also note that searching "27th Sundance Film Festival" at Sundance.org using Google yields no results.[3] –Dream out loud (talk) 00:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Support - seems to be accurate; the year version gets way more Google hits as well. — Amakuru (talk) 12:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I've been a volunteer at Sundance for the last three years. Except for 2009, none of the screen washes, film guides, banners, posters, etc., used the ordinal identifier. The 2009 Festival did reference to the ordinal because it was the 25th festival - one of those numbers that we humans deem 'important'. -- Trappist the monk (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support even the Olympics which are referred to in this manner officially, are labelled by year in Wikipedia. It's much simpler and easier to refer to it by year. 65.93.12.101 (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support if for no other reason that it's just easier to remember. Jhunt47 (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 Sundance Film Festival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 Sundance Film Festival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110202091346/http://www.sundance.org/festival/article/2011-competition-film-announcement/ to http://www.sundance.org/festival/article/2011-competition-film-announcement/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.reuters.com/fanfare/2011/01/27/sundances-unheralded-short-film-and-grant-winners/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]