France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Contemporary philosophy

Lyotard

Categorization of Jean-Francois Lyotard as "deconstructionist" strikes me as highly unusual. 91.153.135.74 18:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I think that this article is unnecessary. The little that isn't contained in the French philosophy article should be sent there and the rest deleted. Le vin blanc 06:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. There are also various assertions on this page which are crying out for citation-reqd flagging, which won't leave the page looking any prettier. This can be avoided by just merging up anything here which can improve the main article. I'm going to add a merger proposal. AllyD (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a bit belated but I agree too, I mean, there is no equivalent article for, say, 20th century German philosophy.Matthew Fennell (talk) 02:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Key thinkers

The edit warring with the anonymous IP that removes Bracha L. Ettinger from all articles prompted the discussion on her importance, which is certainly a good thing.

I am not an expert on French philosophy, but is she really a "key thinker"?

Just food for thought - i don't actually have an opinion. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC) yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.119.208.127 (talk) 22:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

=

How is Camus not part of an entry about 20th-century French philosophy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:45FA:B350:217:F2FF:FE0C:CEBB (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

?

I'm curious to know why Simone Weil was omitted from this entry. Voltaire1 (talk) 19:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm even more curious as to why Camus is not here. Hello????