This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
RickStrate2029, do you have any actual argument for why all four candidates should go in the infobox? WP:5%R establishes the precedent that only candidates with 5% of the vote should be in the infobox. You can't just ignore me and say that I "lack an argument," the way a discussion works is that you actually respond and explain why you think I'm wrong. Also, why do you keep talking about me in the third person? It's really weird BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mentioning @CRGreathouse, who mediated last dispute about this topic over at 2022 Alaska's at-large congressional district special election. I think a very brief mention of the spoiler effect in the 2022 race is important context for why Nancy Dahlstrom dropped out, and should be included in this article. @BottleOfChocolateMilk claims it's biased against RCV to describe the spoiler effect that occurred in that election. I have cited several reliable sources describing the race as spoiled. Do you think this is reasonable information to include, so long as the mention is brief (1-2 sentences on why Dahlstrom dropped out?) – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 01:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's important that the spoiler effect is mentioned. Without this context it's hard to understand the behavior of the candidates or the outcome of the election. I agree that such mention is brief.
As a rule of thumb I like RCV, so I don't this this is merely a case of slandering an RCV method. I feel like the general Wikipedia policy is to follow Brandeis and let sunlight disinfect.