Talk:2024 NFL season

Matthew Slater

What should we put as Matthew Slater's position in the "Notable Retirements" section?

I know he's listed as a wide receiver, but he's not know for what he did as a WR (he made one reception in his career). He's more well known as a special teamer.

If Devin Hester is listed as a kick returner (see the 2018 page), I feel that Slater should be listed for what he's known for: a Speical Teamer. WeDemBoyz42119 (talk) 18:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

"Special teamer" is not a position that's assigned on any roster. Slater is a wide receiver that played special teams. Hester should probably be updated to such as well. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Hester is known as a returner than a receiver. I feel that Slater should be recognized for what he did. (How many WR's with 10 Pro Bowls selections only caught one pass in their career?)

This doesn't come up often, since most notable players played real positions. If not special teamer, why not list him as a Gunner? That's a bit more specificity what he did. WeDemBoyz42119 (talk) 18:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I understand what you're saying, but kick returner, punt returner, and "special teamer" are not positions that players are assigned on the roster. In fact, Matthew Slater is actually still listed on the Patriots website as a wide receiver. I understand what Hester is known for, but despite that, he was still defined as a wide receiver for roster purposes. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I still don't believe Slater should be a WR. He's listed as a Special Teamer on the Pro Bowl rosters.

Hester I'll give a pass because he was a decent WR. Slater, however, almost never lined up as a WR. I feel maybe a one-time exception should be made for him, since most Gunners don't have 10 Pro Bowl selections. WeDemBoyz42119 (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Despite what you feel, factually speaking, Slater was a wide receiver, even if not utilized as such. I'm personally against designating him as a "gunner" in this, partially because we don't get to define a player's position and partially because we wouldn't have an acronym that's recognized and easily understood as gunner. For reference, players are listed as edge rushers for All-Pro selections as well, see 2023 All-Pro Team for an example. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

He is officially listed as a WR, so it should stay, especially since "special teamer" and "gunner" are not actual positions (i.e. not listed on the positions table immediately above the list of retired men). I do think the special teams component can be added later in the entry so readers know that is the reason Slater is notable. For example, WR Matthew Slater – Ten-time Pro Bowler, eight-time All-Pro (five first-team, three second-team) as a special teams player, and three-time Super Bowl champion (XLIX, LI, LIII). Played for New England during his 16-year career. Frank Anchor 19:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I would be okay with this, because he didn't make 10 Pro Bowls and 8 All-Pros as a wide receiver. Like I mentioned, he caught only one pass in 16 years.

I few like this would be a solid compromise.

As for Hester, should we leave him as a KR, or change it to WR and mention his Pro Bowls and All-Pros as a return specialist? WeDemBoyz42119 (talk) 19:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I think we could do the same for Hester: WR Devin Hester [...] x-time Pro Bowler and All Pro as a return specialist. Frank Anchor 20:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan! WeDemBoyz42119 (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Should be in 2023 season. This article says season begins in September but he retired in February 2A0A:EF40:205:7101:5BD:AE21:C2CD:FD19 (talk) 09:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

@2A0A:EF40:205:7101:5BD:AE21:C2CD:FD19: That's not how it goes. He retired after his 2023 season had been completed, which is why we list him here. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Free Agency

It's now the 14th of March in the United States. What confirmation is required before free agent deals are ready to be added to this page? The Voivodeship King (talk) 11:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

@The Voivodeship King: Something from the team, player, or the player's agent. Make sure the phrasing in the article doesn't say "rumored" or "reported", as those tell you it's WP:BLPGOSSIP. See WP:SPORTSTRANS. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I've checked some obvious players for official announcements by the team and have found one for Kirk Cousins, so I've added that and included the link in my edit description. The Voivodeship King (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Justin Feilds

Considered Notable: -Starting QB for Bears -11th overall draft pick -MAJOR draft implications

Has been confirmed as an official trade by both the Bears and Steelers

Do not remove this trade from the page as it is one of the more notable trades of this season and has been confirmed as official. Wibbit23 (talk) 03:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

The established, OBJECTIVE criteria for what is a notable trade say this trade is not notable. The inclusion criteria is either (1) a player is included on both sides of the trade N, (2) a draft pick in the fourth round or earlier is included in the trade N (if Fields meets the criteria for this trade to be upgraded to a fourth round pick, the tradecan be added to the article AFTER the 2024 regular season ends) or (3) a player involved in the trade has been selected to a Pro Bowl prior to the trade N. This criteria was implemented after a discussion at Talk:2019 NFL season due to many non-notable trades being included. Also, at Talk:2022 NFL season#Baker Mayfield there was discussion to make an exception for a similar trade involving Baker Mayfield (who, at the time, was equally if not more notable than Fields is now). The consensus at that discussion was to not make an exception to this notability criteria. Therefore the Fields trade must not be included. Frank Anchor 13:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Also, another user brought up if this trade is removed, that the Mixon trade should also be removed. However, the Mixon trade must stay because he was selected to a Pro Bowl. Frank Anchor 13:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Not that I have anything to add, but I agree with and support the explanation provided by Frank. Fields does not qualify for inclusion in the list at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Emergency Quarterback Rule Change

The NFLPA announced that they have vetoed the rule change agreed to at the owners meeting back in March 2024 allowing emergency quarterbacks to come from the practice squad. How should this be mentioned on the page? Should it be listed as a rule change that was agreed to and then vetoed, or should it just be removed from the page entirely? Litnin200 (talk) 03:07, 27 August 2024 (UTC)